Davis Public Schools Education Foundation
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 201639231
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2010–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2021, Form 990-EZ 2024
- Location
- Davis, CA, USA
- Phone
- 5304009862
- Rating
- 81
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Public Foundations
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $71,597
- Expenses
- $98,694
- Assets
- $170,603
- Liabilities
- $40,075
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
12 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- CHRISTA MILSTEIN (Vice President)
- KELLY HEUNG (President)
People named in this filing
- ERIN AUTRY MONTGOMERY (Treasurer)
- DAVID MILLER (Director)
- CHRISTA MILSTEIN (Vice President)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Support educational excellence in davis public schools by raising funds from the community for district-wide programs.
What it reported doing in 2024
THE FOUNDATION BOARD HAS GATHERED INPUT FROM PARENTS, EDUCATORS AND COMMUNITY LEADERSHIP TO IDENTIFY THE EDUCATIONAL PROGRAM PRIORITIES OF THIS COMMUNITY.THE GRANT went to fund student and counselor-identified Mental Health Initiatives for grades TK_12 such as wellness kits, stocking counselor care closets, and to support Dialectical Behavior therapy sessions on all 7th-12th grade campuses both in group and one on one support sessions.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent revenue detail to tell how this nonprofit funds its work.
- Distribution model
- Grant intermediary. The nonprofit sent 81% of its reported program spending out as grants.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Program spending has declined or grown slowly and revenue has declined or grown slowly.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 93
- Transparency & Controls: 82
- Sustainability: 34
- Growth: 0
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 100%; rating input score 100
- Program expense ratio: 81.4%; rating input score 81
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -37.8%; rating input score 16; 16th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.73; rating input score 61; 61st percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.23; rating input score 13; 13th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: -15.2% per year; rating input score 0; 21st percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: -11% per year; rating input score 0; 23rd percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: -5.6% per year; rating input score 0; 23rd percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 100% of revenue deployed · 81.4% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $80K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 12 people listed
- Consistency: 8 of 8 current checks pass
- Schedules: 2 filed schedules
- Filing history: 11 filing years from 2010 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
- High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 16/100.
- High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
- High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 13/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.