Davis Mountains Fitness and Training Camps Inc Dba Davis Mountains Fitness Camps

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
742605706
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2021–2025
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2025
Location
West Lake Hills, TX, USA
Phone
5124689804
Rating
44
Verdict
MIXED
Rating confidence
Moderate

Reported finances

Revenue
$70,246
Expenses
$67,904
Assets
$16,062
Liabilities
$500

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

10 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • STEVEN WIESE (PRESIDENT-REGISTRAR-ACTIVITIES DIRECTOR)
  • JOHN PRESTON (VICE PRESIDENT ASST REGISTRAR)

People named in this filing

  • STEVEN WIESE (PRESIDENT-REGISTRAR-ACTIVITIES DIRECTOR)
  • JOHN PRESTON (VICE PRESIDENT ASST REGISTRAR)
  • KAREN DOWNING (TREASURER)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Plan and supervise an annual camp to provide fitness activities for people who wish to maintain or increase their fitness through cycling, running, swimming and hiking.

What it reported doing in 2025

The organization planned, organized and ran our annual camp, providing cycling, hiking, running and other outdoor activities, as well as lectures on the history of the Davis Mountains, and environmental and scientific research at nearby universities and research centers in West Texas for 51 campers during a 7-day camp. The organization also made contributions to these non-profit organizations and other local organizations in support of their work.

Operating model

Revenue model
Earned-program. 98% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

MIXED - The filed numbers largely add up. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 18
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 34
  • Growth: 20

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 17.6%; rating input score 18
  • Program expense ratio: 18.2%; rating input score 18

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 3.3%; rating input score 51; 51st percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.24; rating input score 20; 20th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.03; rating input score 20; 20th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 7.1%; rating input score 11; 11th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: -45.4% per year; rating input score 0; 9th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: -6.7% per year; rating input score 0; 30th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 2% per year; rating input score 100; 46th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 17.6% of revenue deployed · 18.2% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $12K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 10 people listed
  • Consistency: 9 of 9 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 1 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 5 filing years from 2021 to 2025
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 7 filed money-flow records
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 18/100.
  • High — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 18/100.
  • High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 20/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 51/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 11/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 20/100.