Davinci Academy of Arts and Science Pto

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
262828945
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2025–2025
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2025, Form 990-N 2024
Location
Ham Lake, MN, USA
Rating
46
Verdict
MIXED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Parent/Teacher Group

Reported finances

Revenue
$54,326
Expenses
$27,986
Assets
$36,073

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

4 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • Sylvia De Long - Onak (President)
  • Amber Lage (Vice President)

People named in this filing

  • Sylvia De Long - Onak (President)
  • Amber Lage (Vice President)
  • Lindsey Gable (Secretary)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

The DaVinci Academy of Arts and Science PTO is a 501c3 nonprofit organized exclusively for charitable and educational purposes. It was formed to support educational opportunities at DaVinci Academy by facilitating volunteer efforts and fundraising for essential projects and materials. The organizations main goal is to enhance student welfare and provide teacher-focused enrichment by fostering open communication and community involvement. By providing a platform for parents and staff to be directly involved in issues affecting the school the PTO acts as an advisory body and sponsors educational family-friendly and community-building programs. Its mission is defined by the motto: Together we teach we learn we grow.

What it reported doing in 2025

Music Education Support - 1 euphonium 1 tuba and 11 guitars were purchased by the school via grants from the PTO. The brass instruments will help round out the student orchestras and will be played by students next year both for daily practice and at their concerts. The 11 guitars will enable 22 students to participate in guitar classes next year and additional students in successive years.

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 99% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

MIXED - The filed numbers largely add up and revenue comfortably covers expenses. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 19
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 64
  • Growth: NotEnoughData

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 13.7%; rating input score 14
  • Program expense ratio: 26.5%; rating input score 27

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 48.5%; rating input score 89; 89th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.29; rating input score 54; 54th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: Limited
  • Revenue growth: Limited
  • Asset growth: Limited

Details

  • Where the money goes: 13.7% of revenue deployed · 26.5% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 3 filed program accomplishments · $7K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 4 people listed
  • Consistency: 7 of 7 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 3 filed schedules
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 14/100.
  • High — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 27/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 54/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.