David's Harp Foundation

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
270910766
IRS 990 coverage
2017–2024
Forms available
Form 990 2024, Form 990-EZ 2016, Form 990-N 2011
Location
San Diego, CA, USA
Phone
6192311977
Rating
70
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Youth Development – Citizenship

Reported finances

Revenue
$1,686,191
Expenses
$1,255,118
Assets
$2,327,327
Liabilities
$12,573

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

9 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • BRANDON STEPPE (FOUNDER/EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR)

Highest reported compensation

  • BRANDON STEPPE (FOUNDER/EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR): $118,124 total reported compensation
  • ADRIAN RODRIGUEZ-CANTERO (COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT MANAG): $29,535 total reported compensation

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

To inspire, educate, and empower "opportunity youth", to achieve academic success through music education, sound engineering, and multimedia production.

What it reported doing in 2024

The transformation house, also known as the launchpad, was created in response to a critical need observed within the david's harp foundation's biz pod program: nearly 60% of participating youth were experiencing some form of homelessness--sleeping on couches, in cars, or bouncing between unstable housing situations. To address this, tdhf established a residential program that offers both stability and opportunity for transitional-aged youth (1824) working toward independence. Located in southeast san diego--just blocks from public transportation and six miles from tdhf's downtown production facility--the launchpad provides a safe, supportive living environment rooted in relationship. As youth earn income through paid creative work in the biz pod program, they contribute $500 per month toward rent. These payments are held in an escrow savings account and reported to build their credit. After 12 months, youth access their full savings to cover first month's rent, last month's rent, and move-in expenses for their own apartment. The launchpad has since expanded to serve youth through multiple referral pathways, including the less restrictive placement (lrp), probation, and other community partners. While all residents participate in the same workforce, development, mentorship, life-skills training, and structured residential programming, funding models vary by referral source. Youth placed through lrp or probation receive sponsored housing and coordinated support from case managers, probation officers when applicable, and tdhf staff. The launchpad combines workforce engagement with financial literacy, budgeting, and daily life skills. Youth receive wraparound mentorship from artist mentors, including regular check-ins, individualized coaching, and connection to community resources. The program reflects tdhf's core belief that transformation is made possible through trust, consistency, and opportunity. By pairing stable housing with meaningful employment and relationship-based support, the launchpad equips young people not only to exit homelessness--but to thrive as creative, independent leaders in their communities.

Operating model

Revenue model
Mixed. Its operating money came from several sources; no one source provided a clear majority.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
  • Includes noncash contributions: Reported contributions include donated property or goods.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and most voting board members are independent. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and fundraising costs are high for each dollar raised.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 50
  • Transparency & Controls: 92
  • Accountability: 71
  • Sustainability: 69
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 47.3%; rating input score 47
  • Program expense ratio: 63.6%; rating input score 64
  • Fundraising efficiency: $6.11 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 23; 23rd percentile among comparable filings

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: Limited
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: Limited
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 77.8%; rating input score 78; 17th percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 5 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 62
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Pass
    • Document-retention policy: Pass
    • CEO compensation review process: Pass
    • Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Fail
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Missing
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Fail

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 25.6%; rating input score 81; 81st percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.85; rating input score 62; 62nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.01; rating input score 73; 73rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 11.8%; rating input score 31; 31st percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 20.9% per year; rating input score 100; 83rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 23.8% per year; rating input score 100; 89th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 29.4% per year; rating input score 100; 90th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 47.3% of revenue deployed · 63.6% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 7 of 9 board members independent · 5 of 8 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 7 filed program accomplishments · $798K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $118K · 9 people listed
  • Consistency: 25 of 25 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 6 filed schedules · includes major donors
  • Filing history: 8 filing years from 2017 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 3 filed money-flow records
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 47/100.
  • High — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 23/100.
  • Review — Accountability: Governance controls: 2 of 7 not reported.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 31/100.