David Corn Ministries
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 810896290
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2023–2025
- Forms available
- Form 990 2025, Form 990-EZ 2022
- Location
- Houston, TX, USA
- Phone
- 2812560853
- Rating
- 73
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Christianity
- Affiliation
- Christianity
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $236,065
- Expenses
- $210,413
- Assets
- $181,728
- Liabilities
- $18,559
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
6 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- Mr David M Corn (President, Evangelist, Youth Speaker)
- Mrs Joy E Corn (Vice President, Musician, Counselor)
Highest reported compensation
- Mr David M Corn (President, Evangelist, Youth Speaker): $54,368 total reported compensation
- Mrs Joy E Corn (Vice President, Musician, Counselor): $13,910 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
DCM will be organized for the exclusive purposes of charitable, educational, and religious, within the meaning section 501(c)(3) of the IRS Code of 1986, as amended in future Federal tax law ("Section 501(c)(3)") and intends to comply with $151.310(aX2) for Religious, Educational, and Public Service Organizations found in the Limited Sales, Excise, and Use Tax Act of Texas and will operate as a IRS 501(c)3 organization, which status it will seek. Should DCM ever require, its dissolution will be according to Texas Business Organizations Code 522.304 and will not distribute its assets to individuals, but rather to another qualified 501(c)3 organization. DCM is being organized exclusively for exempt purposes and none of its net eamings will inure to the benefit of any private individual. DCM will not engage substantially to influence legislation or political campaigns, DCM will operate according to public policy (i.e. no racial discrimination) and biblical standards.
What it reported doing in 2025
Produced 24 Magic & Morality Rallies attended by an average of 348 people.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 92% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. A relatively small share of voting board members are independent and some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 83
- Transparency & Controls: 82
- Accountability: 50
- Sustainability: 42
- Growth: 60
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 89.2%; rating input score 89
- Program expense ratio: 100%; rating input score 100
- Fundraising efficiency: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 84.6%; rating input score 85; 3rd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: 88.3%; rating input score 88; 53rd percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 50%; rating input score 50; 19th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 4 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 50
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Fail
- Document-retention policy: Fail
- CEO compensation review process: Pass
- Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Missing
- Independent financial-statement audit: Fail
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 10.9%; rating input score 58; 58th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.86; rating input score 37; 37th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.1; rating input score 22; 22nd percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 32.4%; rating input score 9; 9th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: -19.3% per year; rating input score 0; 6th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 11.4% per year; rating input score 100; 73rd percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 11.3% per year; rating input score 100; 67th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 89.2% of revenue deployed · 100% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 3 of 6 board members independent · 4 of 8 filing controls reported
- Programs: 5 filed program accomplishments · $210K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $54K · 6 people listed
- Consistency: 39 of 41 current checks pass · 2 findings to review
- Schedules: 6 filed schedules · includes major donors and grants
- Filing history: 3 filing years from 2023 to 2025
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 6 filed money-flow records
- Related organizations: 1 filed related-organization link
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Review — Accountability: Independent voting board scored 50/100.
- Review — Accountability: Governance controls: 3 of 7 not reported.
- High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 58/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 37/100.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 9/100.
- High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 22/100.
- Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Schedule A contributions reconciliation did not reconcile in the filed values.
- Review — Transparency & Controls: Domestic grant itemization did not reconcile in the filed values.