David Christian Ministries
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 811009896
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2017–2025
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2025
- Location
- Grandville, MI, USA
- Phone
- 6162883038
- Rating
- 75
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Affiliation
- Christianity
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $45,869
- Expenses
- $26,457
- Assets
- $20,755
- Liabilities
- $1,110
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
5 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- DAVID CHRISTIAN (PRESIDENT)
People named in this filing
- DAVID CHRISTIAN (PRESIDENT)
- GERRI CHRISTIAN (VICE PRESIDE)
- BRUCE KROUSKOP (DIRECTOR)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
David christian ministries will publish materials, teach "the faith,- and preach the gospel, making all effort toward both the english speaking and latino communities, as well as to the rest of the world, in order to further their vision.
What it reported doing in 2025
David christian ministries will write, publish and disseminate teaching materials that further the vision, such as the first book on defining what a disciple of the lord jesus christ is (as defined by himself in the four gospels of the new testament), and on other subjects emanating from it, such as marriage and family, spiritual warfare, the latin explosion and n.t. Gifts & ministries, first in both english & spanish, then other languages as may be feasible.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and program spending has grown recently. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and total assets are small relative to annual expenses; liquid coverage is unknown.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 54
- Transparency & Controls: 100
- Sustainability: 56
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 42.1%; rating input score 42
- Program expense ratio: 72.9%; rating input score 73
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 42.3%; rating input score 87; 87th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.78; rating input score 41; 41st percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.05; rating input score 18; 18th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 27.4%; rating input score 7; 7th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 2.5% per year; rating input score 100; 54th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 5.2% per year; rating input score 100; 70th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 17.2% per year; rating input score 100; 81st percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 42.1% of revenue deployed · 72.9% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $19K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 5 people listed
- Consistency: 7 of 7 current checks pass
- Schedules: 3 filed schedules
- Filing history: 8 filing years from 2017 to 2025
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 42/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 41/100.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 7/100.
- High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 18/100.