Daughters of Sarah Nursing Center

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
237120570
IRS 990 coverage
2010–2024
Official website data refreshed
Sep 2026
Forms available
Form 990 2024
Location
Albany, NY, US
Phone
(518) 456-7831
Rating
85
Verdict
STRONG
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Nursing, Convalescent Facilities
Affiliation
Judaism

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$29,159,762
Expenses
$26,172,467
Assets
$48,228,907
Liabilities
$4,481,955

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

20 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • MARK KOBLENZ (CEO - see Schedule J Part III)

Highest reported compensation

  • MARK KOBLENZ (CEO - see Schedule J Part III): $464,904 total reported compensation
  • COURTNEY MULSON (CFO - see Schedule J Part III): $369,589 total reported compensation
  • LISA MARRELLO (ADMINISTRATOR): $235,605 total reported compensation

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

As a non-profit, 501(c)3 organization, the mission of Daughters of Sarah Jewish Foundation is to raise the financial resources needed to provide programs and services that will help elder adults live their best lives.

What it reported doing in 2024

Daughters of sarah nursing center's ("daughters") mission to enhance the quality of life, assure the safety and dignity, and foster the independence of those we serve through residential, personal care, health and other services, consistent with jewish values and traditions is accomplished through the operation of a skilled nursing facility licensed by the New York state department of health. Daughters is a 210 bed facility providing 24-hour care for frail and disabled seniors, most of whom are indigent. (it is estimated that, on average, 54% of our residents receive benefits through the medicaid program.) by meeting all of their nursing and personal care needs, residents are able to live and age in a dignified, respectful and self-independent manner approprpriate to their health condition and personal requirements. Programs that all meld to achieve our goal include: round the clock nursing care, social service coordination, medical services appropriate to their care needs, kosher meals prepared in accordance with jewish dietary laws, daily activity programming for both physical and mental stimulation appropriate to resident acuity levels (including specialized dementia / memory loss care designed for each resident's individual needs), regular entertainment programs, weekly jewish sabbath services, christian services, religious chaplainacy services, celebration of all jewish holidays (and coordination of activities around the holiday themes), and other scheduled events calculated to bring happiness to the lives of our residents. Further, daughters specializes in offering a short-term rehabilitation program for persons in need of in-house rehabilitation and, on a limited basis, outpatient therapy for a short period of time after a health incident, with the expectation that they can return home to their regular lives. Daughters also offers respite care to adults in the community. This short-term respite service provides one to thirty nights of loving, safe, medically supervised care for the senior or disabled adult who cannot be alone, and whose caregiver needs to temporarily be away from home. Respite care is a community based alternative to prevent or delay admission to a nursing home. Daughters is committed to care for residents during the final phases of life through a palliative care program offered to residents and families. This program enables residents and families to live with dignity and honor during the time of terminal illness and loss.

Operating model

Revenue model
Earned-program. 92% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered and total assets are small relative to annual expenses; liquid coverage is unknown.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 73
  • Transparency & Controls: 94
  • Accountability: 95
  • Sustainability: 63
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 76.9%; rating input score 77
  • Program expense ratio: 89.6%; rating input score 90
  • Fundraising efficiency: Limited

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 62nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: 6 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 100
    • Compensation committee: Pass
    • Independent consultant: Pass
    • Other Form 990s reviewed: Pass
    • Written employment contract: Pass
    • Compensation survey or study: Pass
    • Board or committee approval: Pass
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: Limited
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 66th percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 8 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 89
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Pass
    • Document-retention policy: Pass
    • CEO compensation review process: Pass
    • Other executive compensation review process: Pass
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Fail
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Pass

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 10.2%; rating input score 68; 68th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.84; rating input score 59; 59th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.09; rating input score 75; 75th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 5.7%; rating input score 45; 45th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 2.6% per year; rating input score 100; 23rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 2.5% per year; rating input score 100; 22nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 2.1% per year; rating input score 100; 18th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • What they do: 4 programs and campaigns described on the official site · 1 operating location identified
  • Where the money goes: 76.9% of revenue deployed · 89.6% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 15 of 15 board members independent · 8 of 9 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $23.5M in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $465K · 20 people listed · 6 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
  • Highest-paid contractors: 5 contractors listed · $3.8M reported
  • Consistency: 39 of 39 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 6 filed schedules · includes major donors and executive pay
  • Filing history: 14 filing years from 2010 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 5 filed money-flow records
  • Related organizations: 2 filed related-organization links
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Review — Accountability: Governance controls: Audit committee oversight not reported.
  • Review — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 59/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 45/100.