Daughters of Isis of North & South America

Nonprofit profile at a glance

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

11 people listed

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Unite in one common bond of friendship the mothers, wives, sisters, daughters, widows, granddaughters, nieces the legal adoptees of all nobles.

The information is based on the financial statements sent and reviewed by the board and audited by the Internal Auditors of the organization.

Revenue model: Earned-program. 99% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
Distribution model: Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.

- The available evidence is not sufficient to produce an overall rating for this filing. This is not a warning sign.

Consistency checks: 70%; rating input score 70; 0th percentile among comparable filings
Pay-setting controls: Limited
Foreign activity oversight: Limited
Grant itemization coverage: Limited
Major donor itemization: Limited
Related-party transparency: Limited

Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
Governance controls: 1 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 14
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Fail
- Whistleblower policy: Fail
- Document-retention policy: Fail
- CEO compensation review process: Limited
- Other executive compensation review process: Limited
- Form 990 shared with the board: Fail
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Missing
- Independent financial-statement audit: Fail

Operating margin: -13.4%; rating input score 14; 14th percentile among comparable filings
Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.82; rating input score 36; 36th percentile among comparable filings
Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.03; rating input score 60; 60th percentile among comparable filings
Officer compensation ratio: 20.2%; rating input score 15; 15th percentile among comparable filings

Program expense growth: -5.9% per year; rating input score 0; 7th percentile among comparable filings
Revenue growth: 5.1% per year; rating input score 100; 44th percentile among comparable filings
Asset growth: 7.7% per year; rating input score 100; 50th percentile among comparable filings

Where the money goes: Financial trends and filed revenue, expense, asset, and liability detail
Governance: 12 of 12 board members independent · 1 of 9 filing controls reported
Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment
Leadership: top reported pay $42K · 11 people listed
Consistency: 8 of 9 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
Schedules: 2 filed schedules
Filing history: 12 filing years from 2010 to 2024
Contacts: How to reach this organization
Money network: 11 filed money-flow records
Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

High — Accountability: Governance controls: 5 of 6 not reported.
Review — Transparency & Controls: Domestic grant itemization did not reconcile in the filed values.
High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 14/100.
High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 36/100.
High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 15/100.