Data Science & Decision Intelligence Leadership Institute Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 883287682
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2023–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2022, Form 990-EZ 2024
- Location
- Arlington, TX, USA
- Phone
- 4802725900
- Rating
- 86
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Computer Science
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $10,352
- Expenses
- $13,628
- Assets
- $242,624
- Liabilities
- $14,629
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
3 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- EDWARD ALVAREZ (PRESIDENT/TREAS)
People named in this filing
- EDWARD ALVAREZ (PRESIDENT/TREAS)
- FRANCES COFFEE (Secretary)
- IRIS YANG (Director)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
The organization conducts scientific and analytics research on transformational community development challenges, applying the findings to educate and empower individuals.
What it reported doing in 2024
The organization conducts data science and analytics research on transformational community development challenges, applying the findings to educate and empower individuals with the knowledge and tools to be a catalyst for positive change. Research projects include the Tarrant County Jail Population where the organization is monitoring of jail populations providing data analytics to improve decision making on better allocation of taxpayer resourses. Another research project is analytics to quantify the offenders by demographics and number/type of offenses so that Tarrant County can allocate resources to creating community rehabilitation programs to reduce criminality and reduce recidivism.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent revenue detail to tell how this nonprofit funds its work.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Program spending has declined or grown slowly and revenue has declined or grown slowly.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 100
- Transparency & Controls: 82
- Sustainability: 45
- Growth: 20
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 100%; rating input score 100
- Program expense ratio: 100%; rating input score 100
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -31.6%; rating input score 18; 18th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 17.8; rating input score 95; 95th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.06; rating input score 20; 20th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: -3.3% per year; rating input score 0; 39th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: -137.5% per year; rating input score 0; 1st percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 1.6% per year; rating input score 100; 45th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 100% of revenue deployed · 100% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $14K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 3 people listed
- Consistency: 8 of 8 current checks pass
- Schedules: 2 filed schedules
- Filing history: 2 filing years from 2023 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
- High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 18/100.
- High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 20/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.