Dar-E-Hussain

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
475146602
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2015–2016
Official website data refreshed
Jun 2026
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2016
Location
Carrollton, TX, USA
Phone
2146801919
Rating
60
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Islam
Affiliation
Islam

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$61,191
Expenses
$60,570
Assets
$272,657
Liabilities
$189,640

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2016. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

6 people listed

People named in this filing

  • Ali Murtaza (Director)
  • Muhammed I Khan (Director)
  • Mir T Hussain (Director)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2016. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

To provide facilities for the members and their families to worship and observe the same. The purpose of the organization is to assist all the devotees by guiding them to be a better human being.

What it reported doing in 2016

Muharram is the first month of Islamic Calendar. We Shia Muslims observe and respect Muharram as the month that martyred Imam Hussain (A.S.), the grandson of Muhammad and son of Imam Ali (A.S.) in the Battle of Karbala. Mourning is for around 68 days where visiting lecturers educate the teaching of Prophet Mohammed (A.S.), Imam Ali (A.S.), Imam Hussain (A.S.) and family members who were martyred in Karbala.

Operating model

Revenue model
Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent revenue detail to tell how this nonprofit funds its work.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 45
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 55
  • Growth: 40

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 45.4%; rating input score 45
  • Program expense ratio: 45.9%; rating input score 46

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 1%; rating input score 48; 48th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 4.5; rating input score 83; 83rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.7; rating input score 9; 9th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 35.5% per year; rating input score 100; 90th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: -49.8% per year; rating input score 0; 7th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: -0.5% per year; rating input score 0; 41st percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • What they do: Mission, programs, and operating context captured from the official website.
  • Where the money goes: 45.4% of revenue deployed · 45.9% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 0 of 6 affiliation controls reported
  • Accomplishments: 2 filed program accomplishments · $28K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 6 people listed
  • Consistency: 7 of 7 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 2 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 2 filing years from 2015 to 2016
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 45/100.
  • Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 46/100.
  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 48/100.
  • High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 9/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.