Daly City Peninsula Partnership Collaborative

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
061734338
IRS 990 coverage
2009–2024
Forms available
Form 990 2024
Location
Daly City, CA, USA
Phone
6503013305
Rating
77
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Human Service Organizations

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$6,797,471
Expenses
$6,944,647
Assets
$1,437,056
Liabilities
$153,817

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

12 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • MIKE STANCIL (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR)
  • MELINDA DART (President)
  • ELENA VERA (Vice President)

Highest reported compensation

  • MIKE STANCIL (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR): $199,039 total reported compensation
  • JON IIYAMA (ASSOCAITE E.D.): $118,746 total reported compensation

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

The daly city peninsula partnership collaborative was formed in 1995 with a mission to guide collaborative efforts and connect our community to services that promote well-being. The daly city peninsula partnership collaborative was formed to promote and facilitate collaborative efforts to ensure that all members of the community have access to health, education and social services.

What it reported doing in 2024

After school academic programs (asap) classes are offered at 15 schools in the four school districts in daly city: bayshore, brisbane, south san francisco unified and jefferson elementary school district.kindergarten readiness (kr) summer program that serves children who will be entering kindergarten in the fall and who have not attended a curriculum based preschool program and/or are english language learners. Students meet their kindergarten teacher in their future classroom, learn basic academic preparedness, and practice appropriate classroom behavior.literacy tutoring children who are behind their grade level in reading are referred by their classroom teacher to this program. The low ratio of teacher to students builds a more personal environment that allows each tutor to determine each childs learning style. Reading and writing are enhanced by games, music and other creative activities.homework assistance instructional AIDS from the same school sites assist children with a history of low homework completion or poor quality assignments by offering adequate structure, space and supervision to do their homework on campus during after school hours.enrichment classes offers life-long enriching activities to children, as well as enlarge the scope of a childs learning by offering a variety of experiences for them to explore. Classes include dance, music, art, science and other enjoyable classes.

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 64% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
  • Includes noncash contributions: Reported contributions include donated property or goods.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and most voting board members are independent. Few specific pay-setting methods are documented in the filing; unanswered boxes are not proof of absence and expenses are high relative to revenue.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 79
  • Transparency & Controls: 65
  • Accountability: 100
  • Sustainability: 27
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 89.8%; rating input score 90
  • Program expense ratio: 87.9%; rating input score 88
  • Fundraising efficiency: Limited

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: 0 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 0
    • Compensation committee: Missing
    • Independent consultant: Missing
    • Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
    • Written employment contract: Missing
    • Compensation survey or study: Missing
    • Board or committee approval: Missing
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: Limited
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 8 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 100
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Pass
    • Document-retention policy: Pass
    • CEO compensation review process: Pass
    • Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Pass
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Pass

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -2.2%; rating input score 26; 26th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.21; rating input score 6; 6th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.11; rating input score 57; 57th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 4.6%; rating input score 57; 57th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 17.2% per year; rating input score 100; 81st percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 12.3% per year; rating input score 100; 75th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 5.9% per year; rating input score 100; 39th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 89.8% of revenue deployed · 87.9% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 10 of 10 board members independent · 8 of 8 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 7 filed program accomplishments · $6.1M in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $199K · 12 people listed · 0 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
  • Consistency: 27 of 27 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 6 filed schedules · includes major donors and executive pay
  • Filing history: 15 filing years from 2009 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 2 filed money-flow records
  • Related organizations: Filed and resolved organization relationships.
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Transparency & Controls: Pay-setting controls scored 0/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 26/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 6/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 57/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 57/100.