Daltons Greater Works
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 271708515
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2019–2025
- Forms available
- Form 990 2025
- Location
- Dalton, GA, USA
- Phone
- 7062702239
- Rating
- 77
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Homeless Shelters
- Affiliation
- Christianity
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $494,442
- Expenses
- $395,872
- Assets
- $551,932
- Liabilities
- $0
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
7 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- Robert Hill (President / CEO)
- Angie Maya (Vice President)
People named in this filing
- Robert Hill (President / CEO)
- Darlene Hill (Board Member)
- Angie Maya (Vice President)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
To help the homeless and indigent in and around Whitfield Co. Georgia; regardless of religion, age, race, sexual orientation, gender, mental stability, or criminal record.
What it reported doing in 2025
Services to the clients, detailed in Schedule I. Includes: rent and utility assistance, food pantry supplies, groceries for meals, prescription and medical assistance (including glasses), client classes and training materials, bus tickets and other transportation, client furnishings (all household supplies), clothing pantry, school supplies, phone cards, legal fees (birth certificates, ID's and Driver's License), funeral expenses, Christmas Toys as an addendum to United Way's 'Sharing is Caring' program. This also includes the Facility used for day center, laundry, showers, food pantry, clothing closet, kitchen, haircut salon, computer area, meetings, training, serving area, eating area, and two storage areas: one for off-season clothing that we give way in the clothing closet; the other for storing furniture and household items we give away, usually to those who have had fires, or are establishing homes. Includes all maintenance, rent, utilities, vehicle fuel, and vehicle maintenance (vehicles are used to pick up and return clients and pick up food for food pantry).
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Hybrid. The nonprofit split its reported program spending across 45% for direct work, and 55% for grants.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered and total assets are small relative to annual expenses; liquid coverage is unknown.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 78
- Transparency & Controls: 88
- Accountability: 54
- Sustainability: 65
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 80.1%; rating input score 80
- Program expense ratio: 100%; rating input score 100
- Fundraising efficiency: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 91.7%; rating input score 92; 20th percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: 97.1%; rating input score 97; 59th percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 71.4%; rating input score 71; 21st percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 2 of 7 controls in place; rating input score 29
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Fail
- Whistleblower policy: Fail
- Document-retention policy: Fail
- CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Missing
- Independent financial-statement audit: Fail
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 19.9%; rating input score 71; 71st percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.39; rating input score 50; 50th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 77; 77th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 67; 67th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 12.4% per year; rating input score 100; 73rd percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 10.6% per year; rating input score 100; 71st percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 23.3% per year; rating input score 100; 86th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 80.1% of revenue deployed · 100% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 5 of 7 board members independent · 2 of 7 filing controls reported
- Programs: 4 filed program accomplishments · $396K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 7 people listed
- Consistency: 41 of 42 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
- Schedules: 5 filed schedules · includes major donors and grants
- Filing history: 6 filing years from 2019 to 2025
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
- Related organizations: 1 filed related-organization link
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Accountability: Governance controls: 4 of 6 not reported.
- Review — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 50/100.
- Review — Transparency & Controls: Domestic grant itemization did not reconcile in the filed values.