Dallas Junior Hockey Association
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 237420685
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2009–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024
- Location
- Plano, TX, USA
- Phone
- 8773257367
- Rating
- 80
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Winter Sports
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $1,033,354
- Expenses
- $1,033,520
- Assets
- $188,691
- Liabilities
- $25,125
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
8 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- TREY DAVIS (PAST PRESIDENT)
- MALESA ROSE (PRESIDENT)
- GRANT JUENGLING (VICE PRESIDENT)
Highest reported compensation
- ERIC SILVERMAN (DIRECTOR OF HOCKEY): $81,127 total reported compensation
- MALESA ROSE (PRESIDENT): $7,500 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Djha promotes and improves amateur hockey in the dfw area for charitable, educational, and recreational purposes. Djha administers hockey programs and provides instruction for fair play and safety and carries out the duties affiliated with policies and rules of USA hockey & taha.
What it reported doing in 2024
Djha promotes and improves amateur hockey in the dfw area for charitable, educational, and recreational purposes. Djha strives to stimulate interest in amateur youth hockey, administers hockey programs, provides instruction for fair play and safety, and carries out duties affiliated with policies and rules of USA hockey and the Texas amateur hockey association. In the 2024-2025 season djha enabled youth activities through hockey for 168 boys and girls and provided 6 youths scholarships who could not otherwise afford to play. Nine teams participated, aged in ranges in 18u-10u.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Earned-program. 100% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered and fundraising costs are high for each dollar raised.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 87
- Transparency & Controls: 81
- Accountability: 74
- Sustainability: 29
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 98.3%; rating input score 98
- Program expense ratio: 98.3%; rating input score 98
- Fundraising efficiency: $0.51 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 2; 2nd percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 90%; rating input score 90; 5th percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Limited
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 3 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 38
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Fail
- Document-retention policy: Fail
- CEO compensation review process: Fail
- Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Missing
- Independent financial-statement audit: Fail
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -0%; rating input score 35; 35th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.18; rating input score 9; 9th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.13; rating input score 38; 38th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 8.6%; rating input score 42; 42nd percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 2.7% per year; rating input score 100; 30th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 0.8% per year; rating input score 100; 18th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 7.9% per year; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 98.3% of revenue deployed · 98.3% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 11 of 11 board members independent · 3 of 8 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $1M in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $81K · 8 people listed
- Consistency: 17 of 18 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
- Schedules: 2 filed schedules
- Filing history: 12 filing years from 2009 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 2 filed money-flow records
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
Grant-readiness screening is separate from the live rating, not a measure of program quality. Review the source records before making a grant decision.
- Moderate — Accountability: Governance controls: 4 of 7 not reported.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 2/100.
- Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Schedule A contributions reconciliation did not reconcile in the filed values.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 35/100.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 9/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 38/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 42/100.
- High — Grant Readiness: Automatic revocation: this organization had its federal tax-exempt status automatically revoked.