Dallas Irrigation Association
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 841713824
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2019–2025
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2025, Form 990-N 2017
- Location
- Allen, TX, USA
- Phone
- 4693387704
- Rating confidence
- Limited
- Sector
- Business and Industry
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $129,065
- Expenses
- $142,550
- Assets
- $97,615
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
14 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- DAREN HARRIS (PRESIDENT)
People named in this filing
- DAREN HARRIS (PRESIDENT)
- WESLEY BOREN (VICE PRESIDE)
- PATRICK DICKINSON (TREASURER)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Dia is dedicated to the advancement of professional standards and environmental awareness of irrigation professionals in the dfw metroplex. Dia provides training and education for continuing education for licensed irrigation professionals. Dia serves both its members of 600+ and works directly with area entities to improve the knowledge of irrigators and to promote public awareness of the environmental and water conservation benefits of properly designed, installed and maintained irrigation systems. Dia also maintains a website addressing technological advancements in the industry and providing specialty training opportunities and educational content to area irrigation professionals.
What it reported doing in 2025
Formal licensing classes and continuing education classes for new and renewing licensed irrigators in the dallas-ft. Worth area. Dia serves over 600 memebers of the irrigation industry in the dfw metroplex.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Earned-program. 98% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
- Distribution model
- Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.
The verdict
- The available evidence is not sufficient to produce an overall rating for this filing. This is not a warning sign.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: NotEnoughData
- Transparency & Controls: 82
- Sustainability: 23
- Growth: 40
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: Limited
- Program expense ratio: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -10.4%; rating input score 13; 13th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.68; rating input score 47; 47th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
- Officer compensation ratio: 5.3%; rating input score 24; 24th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: Limited
- Revenue growth: 5.8% per year; rating input score 100; 48th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: -2.5% per year; rating input score 0; 20th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: Financial trends and filed revenue, expense, asset, and liability detail
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 2 filed program accomplishments
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 14 people listed
- Consistency: 5 of 5 current checks pass
- Schedules: 1 filed schedules
- Filing history: 6 filing years from 2019 to 2025
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 13/100.
- High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 47/100.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 24/100.