Dale Ebel Ministries
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 264790198
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2012–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2011, Form 990-EZ 2024
- Location
- West Linn, OR, USA
- Phone
- 5039574547
- Rating
- 49
- Verdict
- MIXED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Christianity
- Affiliation
- Christianity
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $104,864
- Expenses
- $93,370
- Assets
- $70,387
- Liabilities
- $427
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
4 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- DALE EBEL (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR)
People named in this filing
- DALE EBEL (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR)
- RICK HENNESSEY (SECRETARY)
- MICHAEL CLARK (CFO)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Extending the good news of the kingdom of god by teaching groups and by discipling individuals and encouraging them to reproduce themselves by teaching and discipling others and having them do the same.
What it reported doing in 2024
Teaching and consulting - teaching: to share the word of god through preaching, teaching the bible and encouraging recipients in their faith, consulting: to consult with, support, mentor, and encourage religious leaders with insights and direction specific to their particular fields. Several were consulted with or mentored during the year, including phone calls with pastors and other ministry leaders to encourage and consult with them concerning the direction of their ministries and how they can accomplish their goals.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
MIXED - The filed numbers largely add up. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 13
- Transparency & Controls: 100
- Sustainability: 48
- Growth: 0
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 12.1%; rating input score 12
- Program expense ratio: 13.6%; rating input score 14
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 11%; rating input score 60; 60th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.75; rating input score 50; 50th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.01; rating input score 45; 45th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 61.7%; rating input score 2; 2nd percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: -6.1% per year; rating input score 0; 18th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: -3.7% per year; rating input score 0; 11th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: -11.7% per year; rating input score 0; 10th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 12.1% of revenue deployed · 13.6% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 6 filed program accomplishments · $13K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 4 people listed
- Consistency: 8 of 8 current checks pass
- Schedules: 3 filed schedules
- Filing history: 13 filing years from 2012 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 2 filed money-flow records
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 12/100.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 14/100.
- High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
- High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
- High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 50/100.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 2/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 45/100.