Dakota Land Trust

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
262437901
IRS 990 coverage
2013–2025
Forms available
Form 990 2025, Form 990-EZ 2012, Form 990-T 2023
Location
Deadwood, SD, USA
Phone
6055781401
Rating
64
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Housing Support

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$5,301
Expenses
$19,202
Assets
$673,893
Liabilities
$90,426

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

12 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • ERIC SWANSON (PRESIDENT)

Highest reported compensation

  • MIKE WALKER (EXECUTIVE DI): $97,853 total reported compensation

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Dakota land trust (dlt) is a community-based organization established to create and preserve a permanent supply of affordable homes for households otherwise priced out of the market in the communities of western sd.

What it reported doing in 2025

Dakota land trust creates opportunities and fosters stewardship of permanently affordable housing for low-income and moderate-income families and individuals. We are designed to provide voluntary assistance for working families by providing equity funding to permanently reduce the cost of homes for qualified homebuyers by removing the land cost from the purchase price. Limited-income homebuyers will purchase their home and receive a 99- year ground lease to the lot on which their home sits - a lease that is assignable to qualified heirs and renewable for a second 99- year term. We place equity limitations into the ground lease agreement that restrict the resale price of the housing in order to maintain its long-term affordability - in an attempt to balance the competing goals of providing a fair return on the initial owner's housing investment, on the one hand, while assuring that the housing unit is kept affordable for the next buyer without requiring additional subsidy, on the other. In so doing, the benefit of the investment of public and private dollars needed to create affordability is preserved for generations to come. Through this program, the quality and affordability of housing for future low- and moderate-income residents of the communities of western South Dakota is preserved. In addition, we address community deterioration in economically disadvantaged neighborhoods by promoting the development, rehabilitation, and maintenance of decent housing in these neighborhoods; by promoting economic opportunities for low-income residents of these neighborhoods; by making land available for projects and activities that improve the quality of life in these neighborhoods; by assisting residents of these neighborhoods in improving the safety and well-being of their community; and by protecting the natural environment and promoting the ecologically sound use of land and natural resources and the long-term health and safety of the communities of western South Dakota. At december 31, 2025, dlt holds 29 properties. Families have been placed in homes and land leases on 25 of these properties. Income from these leases is charged at below market rates.

Operating model

Revenue model
Earned-program. 100% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and most voting board members are independent. A relatively small share of total spending goes to programs and a relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 38
  • Transparency & Controls: 90
  • Accountability: 95
  • Sustainability: 34
  • Growth: 20

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 58.7%; rating input score 59
  • Program expense ratio: 14.3%; rating input score 14
  • Fundraising efficiency: $0 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 4; 4th percentile among comparable filings

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: Limited
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: Limited
  • Major donor itemization: Limited
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 7 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 88
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Pass
    • Document-retention policy: Pass
    • CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Other executive compensation review process: Fail
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Pass
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Pass

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -262.2%; rating input score 10; 10th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 35.09; rating input score 89; 89th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.13; rating input score 13; 13th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 15.9%; rating input score 11; 11th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: -4.4% per year; rating input score 0; 36th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: -7.1% per year; rating input score 0; 36th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 3.1% per year; rating input score 100; 54th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 58.7% of revenue deployed · 14.3% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 11 of 11 board members independent · 7 of 8 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 2 filed program accomplishments · $3K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $98K · 12 people listed
  • Consistency: 20 of 20 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 4 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 13 filing years from 2013 to 2025
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Related organizations: 2 filed related-organization links
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 14/100.
  • Review — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 59/100.
  • High — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 4/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 10/100.
  • High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • Review — Accountability: Governance controls: Other executive compensation review process not reported.
  • High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 11/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 13/100.