Dairy Grazing Alliance Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
462694047
IRS 990 coverage
2014–2024
Forms available
Form 990 2024
Location
Medford, WI, USA
Phone
7155600389
Rating
83
Verdict
STRONG
Rating confidence
Standard
Sector
Agricultural Programs

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$2,209,964
Expenses
$2,265,409
Assets
$1,086,539
Liabilities
$477,537

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

12 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • ERIC SHEFFER (PRESIDENT)
  • SCOTT MERICKA (VICE PRESIDENT)
  • JOSEPH TOMANDLIII (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR)

Highest reported compensation

  • JOSEPH TOMANDLIII (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR): $102,799 total reported compensation
  • ANGELA SULLIVAN (COORDINATOR): $87,163 total reported compensation
  • BRIDGET O'MEARA (COORDINATOR): $82,850 total reported compensation

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Dairy grazing alliance brings together stakeholders from across the dairy industry who are dedicated to growing all parts of the dairy grazing sector. The alliance is focused on three primary pillars: 1) enhancing the economic viability of managed grazing farms2) providing producers with resources, education and technical assistance3) convening dairy grazing stakeholders to build an effective movement to help grow the sectorthe alliance's work will grow all parts of the value chain. This means building markets, conducting research and providing the technical support needed to increase profitability for producers who practice managed grazing.dairy grazing alliance vision: transforming the world through regenerative grazing.dairy grazing alliance mission: catalyzing the development of and support for a vibrant managed grazing dairy sector.

What it reported doing in 2024

In fall 2024, dairy grazing apprenticeship became dairy grazing alliance. The apprenticeship is housed inside the alliance. Dairy grazing alliance brings together stakeholders from across the dairy industry who are dedicated to growing all parts of the dairy grazing sector. The alliance is focused on three primary pillars: 1) enhancing the economic viability of managed grazing farms2) providing producers with resources, education and technical assistance3) convening dairy grazing stakeholders to build an effective movement to help grow the sectorthe alliance's work will grow all parts of the value chain. This means building markets, conducting research and providing the technical support needed to increase profitability for producers who practice managed grazing.dairy grazing apprenticeship (dga) is a 501(c)(3) non-profit organization and an accredited formal apprenticeship in "managed grazing" dairy production. The apprenticeship consists of 4,000 hours over two years and combines on-farm employment and training under an approved master dairy grazier with related instruction, which includes formal coursework through accredited education providers, discussion groups, pasture walks, and farming conferences. Dga developed the curriculum and work-based competencies that are registered with the department of labor for the occupation of dairy grazier. Entrants become apprentices, journey dairy graziers, and eventually masters themselves on a career path that has been used in the trades for more than a century. The organization conducts outreach and recruits potential masters and apprentices, assesses and approves master (employer) farm sites, coordinates related instruction components, monitors the mentoring relationship, tracks apprentice progress through on-the-job training and related instruction hours and requirements, and provides educational, technical, and business planning support services to apprenticeship participants. General administrationas dga has continued to expand geographically and to develop board leadership, partner coordination, and programming that ensures that high-quality training in managed grazing dairy production is delivered in a way that is consistent, relevant to evolving market and climate conditions, and inclusive of diverse participants. Climate curriculum for managed grazing innovation centermanaged grazing innovation center (mgic) is dga's online school that provides custom coursework for apprentices and others who are interested in learning about managed grazing production systems, farm business management, and conservation stewardship. Students can take classes individually or complete all six for the managed grazing dairy certificate that is required for apprentices. Because managed grazing works with natural systems, it has long been considered a best practice for environmental outcomes. Perennial systems also allow producers to withstand and adapt to changes in weather patterns through sustainable pasture management practices that sequester carbon, build healthy soils, and protect water quality have already been integrated into mgic classes, "soil and water resources management and "managed grazing systems for dairy cattle," both of which are required for the apprenticeship and are offered during fall semester. Farmer-stakeholder symposiumthe dga grazing summit is a national managed grazing dairy gathering where mentors and partners come together not only to network, socialize, and learn but also to gain perspective on national labor trends, markets, and technologies for managed grazing dairy farms.

Operating model

Revenue model
Grant-funded. 73% of the money available for current operations came from government grants.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
  • Includes noncash contributions: Reported contributions include donated property or goods.

The verdict

STRONG - The filed numbers largely add up and a large share of available resources goes toward mission work. Fundraising costs are high for each dollar raised and some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 72
  • Transparency & Controls: 100
  • Accountability: 91
  • Sustainability: 22
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 73.8%; rating input score 74
  • Program expense ratio: 75.4%; rating input score 75
  • Fundraising efficiency: $15.6 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 52; 52nd percentile among comparable filings

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: Limited
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: Limited
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 7 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 78
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Pass
    • Document-retention policy: Fail
    • CEO compensation review process: Pass
    • Other executive compensation review process: Fail
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Pass
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Pass

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -2.5%; rating input score 25; 25th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.48; rating input score 17; 17th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.44; rating input score 24; 24th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 12%; rating input score 24; 24th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 18.2% per year; rating input score 100; 83rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 16.4% per year; rating input score 100; 84th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 16.7% per year; rating input score 100; 78th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 73.8% of revenue deployed · 75.4% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 9 of 9 board members independent · 7 of 9 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $1.7M in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $103K · 12 people listed
  • Consistency: 27 of 27 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 6 filed schedules · includes major donors
  • Filing history: 10 filing years from 2014 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 3 filed money-flow records
  • Related organizations: 1 filed related-organization link
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

Grant-readiness screening is separate from the live rating, not a measure of program quality. Review the source records before making a grant decision.

  • Review — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 52/100.
  • Review — Accountability: Governance controls: 2 of 9 not reported.
  • High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 25/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 17/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 24/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 24/100.
  • High — Grant Readiness: Federal audit findings: this organization reported findings in its latest federal Single Audit.