Dachshund Rescue of Houston
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 201667729
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2024–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024, Form 990-EZ 2023
- Location
- Friendswood, TX, USA
- Phone
- 8324557881
- Rating
- 54
- Verdict
- MIXED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Animal Protection and Welfare
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $316,953
- Expenses
- $91,984
- Assets
- $380,284
- Liabilities
- $0
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
3 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- KATHLEEN HIGH (PRESIDENT)
People named in this filing
- KATHLEEN HIGH (PRESIDENT)
- TONI RUMLEY (TREASURER)
- MONTE WALL (RECORDING SE)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Dachshund rescue of houston (droh) has one sole purpose: to rescue, rehabilitate, and re-home dachshunds in need of a second chance at life and love. We rescue purebred dachshunds as well as dachshund mixes from pounds and shelters. A small percentage are surrendered directly to us by their owners.
What it reported doing in 2024
Dachshund rescue of houston (droh) is dedicated to rescuing, rehabilitating, and re-homing dachshunds and dachshund mixes in need of a second chance at life and love. Dogs are accepted from shelters, pounds, and private owners, which also helps alleviate the burden on local animal shelters. Droh maintains a lifetime commitment to every dog it rescues, ensuring any dog adopted through the program can return to droh if needed. In 2024, droh rescued 59 dachshunds and dachshund mixes (14 puppies, 43 adults, and 2 seniors). An additional 3 dogs were returned to droh under our lifetime commitment policy. All rescued dogs received immediate veterinary evaluation and care, including spay/neuter, vaccinations, microchipping, and any necessary medical treatment. Droh covered veterinary costs until adoption. Veterinary and direct dog care expenses accounted for 85% of all organizational spending, averaging 1,132 per dog. Droh successfully placed 59 dogs into permanent adoptive homes in 2024, with 3 additional adoptions finalized in early 2025. A network of 87 approved foster homes (7 of which foster regularly) provided safe and supportive environments where dogs received medical care and behavioral evaluation prior to adoption. Drohs operations were carried out entirely by volunteers; the organization had 378 listed volunteers in 2024, with 17 serving in key roles such as adoption coordination, transportation, fundraising, accounting, and grant writing. Fundraising and outreach activities contributed to drohs success in 2024. Events included the world series of dogs, karbach dachtoberfest (3 consecutive sundays), kendra scott fundraisers (2 events), giving tuesday, ruthies go texan days, holler brewery dog racing, sam houston raceway dog racing, and a robertson elementary awareness event. Collectively, these efforts generated 17,967 in donations to support veterinary and foster care. Droh remains a 100% volunteer-run nonprofit organization with no paid employees. In 2024, the organization continued to utilize virtual home visits and meet-andgreets as part of its adoption process, ensuring safety and accessibility while maintaining a high standard of screening for adoptive families.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 96% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
MIXED - The filed numbers largely add up and revenue comfortably covers expenses. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of voting board members are independent.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 43
- Transparency & Controls: 92
- Accountability: 12
- Sustainability: 85
- Growth: 60
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 25.5%; rating input score 25
- Program expense ratio: 87.8%; rating input score 88
- Fundraising efficiency: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 0%; rating input score 0; 7th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 2 of 7 controls in place; rating input score 29
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Fail
- Whistleblower policy: Fail
- Document-retention policy: Fail
- CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Missing
- Independent financial-statement audit: Fail
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 71%; rating input score 96; 96th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 4.13; rating input score 76; 76th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 80; 80th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 69; 69th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: Limited
- Revenue growth: 1.5% per year; rating input score 100; 32nd percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 19.9% per year; rating input score 100; 84th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 25.5% of revenue deployed · 87.8% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 0 of 3 board members independent · 2 of 7 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $81K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 3 people listed
- Consistency: 14 of 14 current checks pass
- Schedules: 3 filed schedules · includes major donors
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: Resolved incoming and outgoing counterparties from filed money flows.
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 25/100.
- High — Accountability: Independent voting board scored 0/100.
- High — Accountability: Governance controls: 4 of 6 not reported.