Da Vinci Charter Academy Boosters Club
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 010846296
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2011–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2024, Form 990-N 2023
- Location
- Davis, CA, USA
- Phone
- 5307577154
- Rating
- 82
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Single Organization Support
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $54,526
- Expenses
- $49,209
- Assets
- $51,334
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
5 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- TRINA CAMPING (Vice President)
- SARAH UYEYAMA (Vice President)
- VALERIE THOMPSON (President)
People named in this filing
- TRINA CAMPING (Vice President)
- SARAH UYEYAMA (Vice President)
- ALLISON GANTER (Treasurer)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
The booster club provides da vinci parents/guardians the opportunity to support the students, faculty and staff consistent with the da vinci charter academy mission to develop mutual support, community, trusting relationships, andcollaboration within the school community.
What it reported doing in 2024
The booster club supports the school where the need is greatest.the senior high and the junior high programs are fully enrolled. This includes about 250 junior high students and about 600 senior high students.the single largest expense was the senior high graduation trip, supporting almost all of the seniors. Other booster support for field trips included: the sacramento museum, helping to pay for entry fees and docent guidance; California academy, help with entry fees; catalina island biology trip, support for travel and participation. These supported most of the roughly 600 high school students and about 100 of the junior high students.the next largest category was grants and projects. This included "signature projects" for grades 10, 11, & 12. Grade 10: wwi night involved group physical displays and online education content. Grade 11: 1929 night involved each group publishing a glossy brochure with different aspects from that time along with physical recreation of period settings. Grade 12: dino's nest involved each group of students pitching innovative ideas, with one of the projects set to receive real-money funding. Boosters supported these projects with supplies, printing, and prize money. School climate is emphasized - there are several hospitality events throughout the year at both schools. Funds provided for meals for student wellness, and for staff and teacher appreciation. Funds were also used for beautification of the campuses.funds were provided for student recruitment, and scholarships & awards to graduating seniors. Teachers and students are recognized for the extra efforts made during the year, and the unique project-based curriculum is supported by the boosters, as well.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent revenue detail to tell how this nonprofit funds its work.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Program spending has declined or grown slowly and revenue has declined or grown slowly.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 91
- Transparency & Controls: 82
- Sustainability: 49
- Growth: 20
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 87.6%; rating input score 88
- Program expense ratio: 97.1%; rating input score 97
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 9.8%; rating input score 61; 61st percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.04; rating input score 47; 47th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: -3.1% per year; rating input score 0; 40th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: -3.8% per year; rating input score 0; 38th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 3.6% per year; rating input score 100; 53rd percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 87.6% of revenue deployed · 97.1% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $48K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 5 people listed
- Consistency: 6 of 6 current checks pass
- Schedules: 3 filed schedules
- Filing history: 12 filing years from 2011 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
- High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 47/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.