Cytometry Educational Associates Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 232291536
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2010–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2023, Form 990-EZ 2024
- Location
- Sedona, AZ, USA
- Phone
- 7169898999
- Rating
- 84
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Higher Education Institutions
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $876
- Expenses
- $25,699
- Assets
- $133,504
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
7 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- C BRUCE BAGWELL MD PHD (PRESIDENT)
People named in this filing
- C BRUCE BAGWELL MD PHD (PRESIDENT)
- PAUL K WALLACE PHD (TREASURER)
- DAGNA SHEERAR (VICE PRESIDE)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
To provide continuing education and applications training for scientists using flow and image cytometry in basic and medical research. Cytometry educational associates, inc. Coordinates the organizing groups that host the courses and maintains the continuity and quality of the course across organizing groups and host sites.
What it reported doing in 2024
Cytometry educational associates, inc. (ceai) is the non-profit umbrella organization that sponsors the annual courses on research applications of cytometry. This long-running series of weeklong hands-on workshops, now in its 4th decade, is offered at rotating host sites under joint sponsorship by ceai and local organizing groups. -during 2024, the annual course was hosted in madison, wi. This course was a collaboration between the university of Wisconsin-madison and cytometry educational associates, inc. All finances for this meeting were managed through the university of Wisconsin. The board meets monthly with the course organizers to provide guidance and assistance.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Investment-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from recurring investment income.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Expenses are high relative to revenue and program spending has declined or grown slowly.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 97
- Transparency & Controls: 82
- Sustainability: 32
- Growth: 20
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 100%; rating input score 100
- Program expense ratio: 92.2%; rating input score 92
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -2,833.7%; rating input score 1; 1st percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 5.19; rating input score 84; 84th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: -11.2% per year; rating input score 0; 26th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: -2.9% per year; rating input score 0; 40th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 13.5% per year; rating input score 100; 79th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 100% of revenue deployed · 92.2% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $24K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 7 people listed
- Consistency: 6 of 6 current checks pass
- Schedules: 2 filed schedules
- Filing history: 8 filing years from 2010 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 1/100.
- High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
- High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.