Cypress Ridge Professional Center Owners Association Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
204812268
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2016–2025
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2025
Location
Tampa, FL, USA
Phone
8139091819
Rating
87
Verdict
STRONG
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Temporary Housing

Reported finances

Revenue
$160,434
Expenses
$151,683
Assets
$11,602
Liabilities
$1,000

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

3 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • GREG VAN BEBBER (Vice President)
  • DILIP KANJI (President)

People named in this filing

  • GREG VAN BEBBER (Vice President)
  • DILIP KANJI (President)
  • WILLIAM KONRAD (Secretary)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

The corporation provides for the maintenance, upkeep, repairs and replacement of the planned community roadways and common area improvements; adminstering and enforcing the covenants and restrictions; collecting and disbursing the asessments and charges of the owners and promoting the safety and welfare of the residents.

What it reported doing in 2025

The corporation provides for the maintenance, upkeep, repairs and replacement of the planned community roadways and common area improvements; adminstering and enforcing the covenants and restrictions; collecting and disbursing the asessments and charges of the owners and promoting the safety and welfare of the residents. Implementation and coordination of these actions account for approximately 80% of the corporate time. The remaining 20% of corporate time is devoted to the general membership meeting where members gather to approve budgets and discuss various topics such as beautification information, zoning and architectural review issues, traffic safety, sinage and other various neighborhood community issues.

Operating model

Revenue model
Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent revenue detail to tell how this nonprofit funds its work.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Total assets are small relative to annual expenses; liquid coverage is unknown and expenses are high relative to revenue.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 97
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 34
  • Growth: 80

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 94.5%; rating input score 95
  • Program expense ratio: 100%; rating input score 100

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 5.5%; rating input score 45; 45th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.08; rating input score 10; 10th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.09; rating input score 22; 22nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 63; 63rd percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 4.3% per year; rating input score 100; 42nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 4.8% per year; rating input score 100; 43rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: -11.8% per year; rating input score 0; 10th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 94.5% of revenue deployed · 100% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $152K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 3 people listed
  • Consistency: 7 of 7 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 1 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 10 filing years from 2016 to 2025
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 10/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 45/100.
  • High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 22/100.