Cypress Chapter Izaak Walton League of America

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
510202033
IRS 990 coverage
2024–2024
Official website data refreshed
Sep 2026
Forms available
Form 990 2024, Form 990-EZ 2023, Form 990-N 2021
Location
Pompano Beach, FL, US
Phone
941-258-1616
Rating
73
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Moderate

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$340,539
Expenses
$290,042
Assets
$108,347
Liabilities
$0

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

10 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • Mike Elfenbein (Executive Director)
  • Marshall Jones (Vice President)
  • Pete Quasius (President)

Highest reported compensation

  • Mike Elfenbein (Executive Director): $148,248 total reported compensation
  • Dr Nora Demers (Director of Science & Outreach): $11,250 total reported compensation
  • Jesse Lee (Director of Shooting Sports): $250 total reported compensation

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

To protect the Big Cypress National Preserve and everything connected to her.

What it reported doing in 2024

The organization advanced restoration of the Greater Everglades ecosystem and regional water-quality improvement through coordinated planning, public engagement, and implementation of science-based conservation practices in partnership with state and federal agencies, local governments, nonprofit organizations, landowners, and community stakeholders. Program staff actively participated in public meetings, technical working groups, and interagency forums to inform restoration priorities, provide field-based expertise, and support collaborative solutions that improve ecosystem function, hydrology, and long-term natural resource management across the watershed. Activities focused on developing and demonstrating innovative approaches to reduce nutrient loading, improve water storage and flow, and restore wildlife habitat across agricultural and conservation landscapes. Efforts included piloting nutrient recycling and soil amendment techniques, promoting best management practices to reduce phosphorus and nitrogen runoff, enhancing wetlands and native habitats, and implementing land stewardship practices that increase water retention, soil health, and biodiversity. These initiatives contribute to measurable improvements in downstream water quality and strengthen the ecological resilience of the Greater Everglades ecosystem. The program also supports landscape-scale conservation and habitat connectivity within the Florida Wildlife Corridor. By restoring working lands and protecting natural systems, the organization enhances wildlife movement between public and private conservation areas, sustains large, connected habitats, and benefits wide-ranging and imperiled species dependent on the Florida Wildlife Corridor. In addition, the organization conducted extensive educational outreach through workshops, field tours, site demonstrations, and presentations for agency personnel, conservation professionals, landowners, students, and members of the public. Programming emphasized practical conservation tools, water stewardship, habitat restoration techniques, and responsible land and wildlife management practices that can be replicated throughout the region. Through these combined restoration, connectivity, and education efforts, the program strengthened partnerships, informed public decision-making, and advanced sustainable solutions that protect water resources, enhance fish and wildlife habitat, support the Florida Wildlife Corridor, and promote long-term conservation outcomes across the Greater Everglades ecosystem for the benefit of the public.

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 93% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 99% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and a large share of available resources goes toward mission work. Some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered and total assets are small relative to annual expenses; liquid coverage is unknown.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 62
  • Transparency & Controls: 90
  • Accountability: 79
  • Sustainability: 47
  • Growth: 60

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 65.4%; rating input score 65
  • Program expense ratio: 76.8%; rating input score 77
  • Fundraising efficiency: Limited

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 90%; rating input score 90; 9th percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: Limited
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: Limited
  • Major donor itemization: Limited
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 4 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 50
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Fail
    • Whistleblower policy: Fail
    • Document-retention policy: Fail
    • CEO compensation review process: Pass
    • Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Pass
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Fail

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 14.8%; rating input score 67; 67th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.37; rating input score 19; 19th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 80; 80th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 55.1%; rating input score 3; 3rd percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: Limited
  • Revenue growth: 192.9% per year; rating input score 100; 100th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 57.6% per year; rating input score 100; 97th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • What they do: 15 programs and campaigns described on the official site · 3 operating locations identified
  • Where the money goes: 65.4% of revenue deployed · 76.8% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 8 of 8 board members independent · 4 of 8 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 2 filed program accomplishments · $112K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $148K · 10 people listed
  • Consistency: 27 of 28 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
  • Schedules: 4 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 1 filing year from 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 3 filed money-flow records
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Review — Accountability: Governance controls: 4 of 8 not reported.
  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 19/100.
  • Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Schedule D land buildings reconciliation did not reconcile in the filed values.
  • High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 3/100.