Cycle Oregon Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
931056645
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2025–2025
Forms available
Form 990 2024, Form 990-EZ 2025
Location
Portland, OR, USA
Phone
5032870405
Rating confidence
Limited

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$0
Expenses
$196,217
Assets
$0
Liabilities
$0

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

6 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • STEVE SCHULZ (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR)
  • CHAD DAVIS (BOARD PRESIDENT)
  • SARAH GATES (BOARD VICE PRESIDENT)

People named in this filing

  • STEVE SCHULZ (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR)
  • CHAD DAVIS (BOARD PRESIDENT)
  • SARAH GATES (BOARD VICE PRESIDENT)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Cycle Oregon, inc. Is a non-profit organization dedicated to transforming individuals and communities through bicycling.

What it reported doing in 2025

As of january 1, 2025, all cycle Oregon, inc. Operations, staff and net assets were assigned to the cycle Oregon foundation, a 501c(c)(3) organization. The majority of foundation board members are no longer appointed by the cycle Oregon, inc. Board; therefore, the two organizations are no longer considered related organizations. Cycle Oregon, inc.'s primary purpose going forward is to make recommendations for grant awards from the cycle Oregon fund, a community advised fund, held at the Oregon community foundation (ocf). During 2025, cycle Oregon, inc. Recommended to ocf to make grant awards from the cycle Oregon fund totaling over $271,000, which ocf distributed to benefiting charities in Oregon.

Operating model

Revenue model
Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent revenue detail to tell how this nonprofit funds its work.
Distribution model
Grant intermediary. The nonprofit sent 100% of its reported program spending out as grants.

The verdict

- The available evidence is not sufficient to produce an overall rating for this filing. This is not a warning sign.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 38
  • Transparency & Controls: 76
  • Sustainability: 7
  • Growth: 0

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: Limited
  • Program expense ratio: 100%; rating input score 100

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 92.9%; rating input score 93; 3rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: Limited
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0; rating input score 3; 3rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: Limited
  • Revenue growth: -7.2% per year; rating input score 0; 29th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: -5.7% per year; rating input score 0; 23rd percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 100% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $196K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 6 people listed
  • Consistency: 8 of 8 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 2 filed schedules
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 2 filed money-flow records
  • Related organizations: 2 filed related-organization links
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 3/100.
  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.