Cybertorial Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 871321260
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2021–2025
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2025
- Location
- Morgan Hill, CA, USA
- Phone
- 4049342619
- Rating
- 70
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Youth Development Programs
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $79,000
- Expenses
- $46,293
- Assets
- $34,583
- Liabilities
- $0
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
5 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- Kim Jones (Vice President)
People named in this filing
- Monique Head (Founder)
- Kim Jones (Vice President)
- Cherie Evans (Treasurer)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Educational animation & comic book shorts that introduce cybersecurity topics in engaging ways using unique female role models to increase interest in cybersecurity field and educate young females on how to stay safe on-line. Our mission is to uncover the unrealized and untapped potential of women, by creating experiences that educate and improve cybersecurity acumen. We aim to provide awareness to targeted populations on cybersecurity mitigation techniques and how to protect oneself online.
What it reported doing in 2025
Secured a contract to create an animation short for Cyber.org. Delivered a 3 minute animation for kids on how to not get phished and used the proceeds from that revenue to develop our animation short with our cyberhero.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Earned-program. 95% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and program spending has grown recently. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and total assets are small relative to annual expenses; liquid coverage is unknown.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 58
- Transparency & Controls: 82
- Sustainability: 61
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 45.8%; rating input score 46
- Program expense ratio: 78.1%; rating input score 78
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 41.4%; rating input score 86; 86th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.75; rating input score 40; 40th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 66; 66th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 10.8%; rating input score 10; 10th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 86.6% per year; rating input score 100; 96th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 79.4% per year; rating input score 100; 98th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 88.6% per year; rating input score 100; 98th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 45.8% of revenue deployed · 78.1% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 5 filed program accomplishments · $36K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 5 people listed
- Consistency: 9 of 9 current checks pass
- Schedules: 1 filed schedules
- Filing history: 5 filing years from 2021 to 2025
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 46/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 40/100.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 10/100.