Cybersecurity Reach Foundation Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 994835568
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2024–2025
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2025
- Location
- New York, NY, USA
- Phone
- 9292370000
- Rating
- 88
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Computer Science
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $5,956
- Expenses
- $6,502
- Assets
- $0
- Liabilities
- $2,633
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
3 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- LEONARD DANIEL MELNIK (President)
People named in this filing
- LEONARD DANIEL MELNIK (President)
- GENT GAZHELI (Director)
- STEFANIE COHEN (Director)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Community-driven nonprofit dedicated to making cybersecurity accessible. Empower individuals with practical solutions and knowledge to navigate the digital world safely.
What it reported doing in 2025
Through our InboxSpotter and CyberScout programs, the organization provided practical cybersecurity education and tools to help thousands of individuals identify phishing emails, recognize scams, and protect themselves online. We hosted multiple workshops in partnership with the Baruch College ISACA student chapter, including educational events such as scam search parties. The organization also runs a volunteer program that trains participants in cybersecurity research and supports them in publishing their own reports. Public awareness was driven through a Google Ad Grant for InboxSpotter, paid social campaigns reaching over 530,000 views on Facebook and 35,000 on Instagram (171,000 reach), and an awareness campaign on LinkNYC public terminals across New York City reaching millions of impressions.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Expenses are high relative to revenue and total assets are small relative to annual expenses; liquid coverage is unknown.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 100
- Transparency & Controls: 82
- Sustainability: 22
- Growth: 80
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 100%; rating input score 100
- Program expense ratio: 100%; rating input score 100
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -9.2%; rating input score 30; 30th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0; rating input score 3; 3rd percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 103.8% per year; rating input score 100; 97th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 199.4% per year; rating input score 100; 100th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: Limited
Details
- Where the money goes: 100% of revenue deployed · 100% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $7K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 3 people listed
- Consistency: 9 of 9 current checks pass
- Schedules: 3 filed schedules
- Filing history: 2 filing years from 2024 to 2025
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 2 filed money-flow records
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 30/100.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 3/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.