Cuyahoga Falls General Hospital

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
340718383
IRS 990 coverage
2010–2010
Forms available
Form 990 2010
Location
Cuyahoga Falls, OH, USA
Phone
3303753196
Rating confidence
Limited
Sector
Hospitals

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$4,928,020
Expenses
$5,498,286
Assets
$43,708,730
Liabilities
$29,957,559

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2010. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

20 people listed

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2010. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

The mission of Cuyahoga Falls General Hospital is to provide the highest quality, compassionate care to patients and members and use the assets for the benefit of the community.

What it reported doing in 2010

Adultcare is a daytime alternative to nursing home and homecare services at Summa Health System (SHS) and is for older adults living at home. We are staffed by healthcare professionals with experience in the special needs of older adults and the elderly. This program provides nursing services, medication administration, healthy meals and snacks, personal care, massage therapy, exercise, activities, access to transportation services, and much more. New Horizons is located in the same building as Summa Western Reserve Hospital. This unique arrangement enables us to provide immediate medical care should a situation arise that requires medical attention. Services also include nutritious meals and organized therapeutic activities. New Horizons is open: Monday through Friday from 6:30 a.m. to 6:30 p.m. Guests may attend one day a week or five days a week, one to 12 hours a day. New Horizons is staffed by healthcare professionals, including: Medical Director Program Director Registered Nurses Licensed Practical Nurses Nursing Assistants Activity Director Security Staff Volunteers

Operating model

Revenue model
Other-operating. 62% of the money available for current operations came from other operating revenue.
Distribution model
Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.

The verdict

- The available evidence is not sufficient to produce an overall rating for this filing. This is not a warning sign.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: NotEnoughData
  • Transparency & Controls: 88
  • Accountability: 79
  • Sustainability: 41
  • Growth: NotEnoughData

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: Limited
  • Program expense ratio: Limited
  • Fundraising efficiency: Limited

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 59th percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: 5 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 83
    • Compensation committee: Pass
    • Independent consultant: Pass
    • Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
    • Written employment contract: Pass
    • Compensation survey or study: Pass
    • Board or committee approval: Pass
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: Limited
  • Major donor itemization: Limited
  • Related-party transparency: Scored; rating input score 0

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 86.7%; rating input score 87; 20th percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 6 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 67
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Pass
    • Document-retention policy: Fail
    • CEO compensation review process: Fail
    • Other executive compensation review process: Fail
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Pass
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Pass

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -11.6%; rating input score 10; 10th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 7.95; rating input score 88; 88th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.69; rating input score 21; 21st percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 2.8%; rating input score 67; 67th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: Limited
  • Revenue growth: Limited
  • Asset growth: Limited

Details

  • Where the money goes: Financial trends and filed revenue, expense, asset, and liability detail
  • Governance: 13 of 15 board members independent · 6 of 9 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 2 filed program accomplishments · $1.6M in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $1.4M · 20 people listed · 5 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
  • Highest-paid contractors: 2 contractors listed
  • Consistency: 25 of 25 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 6 filed schedules · includes executive pay and related organizations
  • Related organizations: 18 filed related-organization links
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Review — Accountability: Governance controls: 3 of 9 not reported.
  • High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 10/100.
  • High — Transparency & Controls: Related-party transparency scored 0/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 21/100.