Cuyahoga Community College Foundation
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 237320719
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2018–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024, Form 990-T 2024
- Location
- Cleveland, OH, USA
- Phone
- 2169874868
- Rating
- 90
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Single Organization Support
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $13,037,349
- Expenses
- $10,699,689
- Assets
- $122,379,921
- Liabilities
- $2,530,975
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
62 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- MEGAN O'BRYAN (PRESIDENT, TRI-C FOUNDATION)
People named in this filing
- MICHAEL A BASTON JD EDD (DIRECTOR)
- ANNE BINGHAM (DIRECTOR)
- MITCHELL G BLAIR (DIRECTOR)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
The mission of the cuyahoga community college foundation is to provide resources for advancing student success at cuyahoga community college and to transform the lives of those tri-c serves. (continued on schedule o)
What it reported doing in 2024
Educational development: tri-c foundation supports developing and enhancing educational programs in response to workforce and student needs. A tri-c education is designed to meet the educational, cultural and economic needs of our communities through innovative programming, especially for high demand careers in creative arts, hospitality management, information technology, manufacturing, nursing and health professions, and public safety. High-quality, industry-relevant courses, and comprehensive, hands-on training ensure that students gain a competitive edge to prepare for success in today's job market. Tri-c programs align with key areas that anticipate future job growth; graduate workers with the skills local employers seek; (continued on schedule o)demonstrate high success rates; use state of-the-art facilities; and receive national recognition.tri-c is among the nation's top 150 community colleges, according to the aspen institute college excellence program. College-wide initiatives are increasing graduation rates, and the number of workforce credentials awarded annually. Charitable investments help to grow resources that address equity gaps in success and completion, such as expanding campus food pantries and maintaining a student emergency fund to cover crisis expenses. Helping students to prepare for a career after completion is a priority, through paid internships and work readiness grants to purchase essential work tools or equipment.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 70% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Grant intermediary. The nonprofit sent 100% of its reported program spending out as grants.
- Includes noncash contributions: Reported contributions include donated property or goods.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Fundraising costs are high for each dollar raised and revenue has declined or grown slowly.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 89
- Transparency & Controls: 94
- Accountability: 94
- Sustainability: 87
- Growth: 60
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 95%; rating input score 95
- Program expense ratio: 91.7%; rating input score 92
- Fundraising efficiency: $16.49 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 52; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 62nd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: 100%; rating input score 100; 72nd percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 66th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 6 of 7 controls in place; rating input score 86
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Fail
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 17.9%; rating input score 80; 80th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 11.44; rating input score 92; 92nd percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.02; rating input score 90; 90th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 96; 96th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 5.9% per year; rating input score 100; 49th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: -0% per year; rating input score 0; 8th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 5.1% per year; rating input score 100; 36th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 95% of revenue deployed · 91.7% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 62 of 62 board members independent · 6 of 7 filing controls reported
- Programs: 2 filed program accomplishments · $9.8M in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 62 people listed
- Consistency: 28 of 28 current checks pass
- Schedules: 8 filed schedules · includes major donors and grants
- Filing history: 7 filing years from 2018 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
- Related organizations: 1 filed related-organization link
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Review — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 52/100.
- High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
- Review — Accountability: Governance controls: Whistleblower policy not reported.