Curtain Up Cancer Foundation
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 822700700
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2018–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2024, Form 990-N 2017
- Location
- San Antonio, TX, USA
- Phone
- 2109699991
- Rating
- 34
- Verdict
- REVIEW
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Health
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $73,973
- Expenses
- $92,890
- Assets
- $4,102
- Liabilities
- $10,121
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
9 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- AMY GILMOUR (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR)
People named in this filing
- RACHEL LARSEN (CHAIRMAN)
- JOHN K RINEHART (VICE CHAIRMAN)
- DR LUIS RODRIGUEZ (MEMBER)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
The mission of the organization is to ease the affects of cancer through the creative arts.
What it reported doing in 2024
The organization organizes and host an annual event called "the six". Thisevent is a celebration of the power within. The six is a unique show thatcelebrates the lives of six people who have been affected by cancer. Eachyear, through a community collaboration, six honorees are selected, andtheir stories are artfully created into an onstage performance. The storiesare performed by professional actors, singers and dancers and take theaudience on a journey of the honorees' lives through a dramatic combinationof storytelling, song and dance. All six stories are unique but the onelink that weaves the stories together is the fortitude in which thehonorees live, survive, and celebrate, even when affected by cancer.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 76% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- No current program activity. The filing reports no program spending for the current year.
The verdict
REVIEW - The filed numbers largely add up. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 0
- Transparency & Controls: 82
- Sustainability: 19
- Growth: 0
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 0%; rating input score 0
- Program expense ratio: 0%; rating input score 0
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -25.6%; rating input score 20; 20th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.04; rating input score 8; 8th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 2.47; rating input score 3; 3rd percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: -26.7% per year; rating input score 0; 14th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: -2.7% per year; rating input score 0; 41st percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: -2.5% per year; rating input score 0; 30th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 0% of revenue deployed · 0% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 9 people listed
- Consistency: 8 of 8 current checks pass
- Schedules: 3 filed schedules
- Filing history: 6 filing years from 2018 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: Resolved incoming and outgoing counterparties from filed money flows.
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 0/100.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 0/100.
- High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
- High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 20/100.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 8/100.
- High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
- High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 3/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.