Cumberland Goodwill Fire Rescue Ems Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 232298422
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2010–2025
- Forms available
- Form 990 2025, Form 990-T 2025
- Location
- Carlisle, PA, USA
- Phone
- 7172490012
- Rating
- 78
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Standard
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $6,428,204
- Expenses
- $6,714,604
- Assets
- $2,428,537
- Liabilities
- $914,933
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
11 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- GREGORY O'BRIEN (PRESIDENT EMT)
- KENNETH CHRONSIAK (VICE PRESIDENT)
Highest reported compensation
- ROBERT PINE (CHIEF/SECRETARY): $261,340 total reported compensation
- NATHAN HARIG (ASSISTANT CHIEF OF ADMINIS): $158,084 total reported compensation
- JEREMY FOX (LIEUTENANT): $151,893 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Cumberland goodwill ems is an emergency service organization that provides emergency medical services to carlisle pa and surrounding townships. These services include emergency medical services, fire/rescue support services, and emergency medical education to the community. Ems services include: ems service to the level of care necessary including advanced and basic life support, and patient transport services. Ems coverage for special events including athletic events, concerts, festivals, mass gatherings and vip visits, including mass casualty incidents as part of the south central pa ems task force. We also provide training and education through the carlisle ems academy.
What it reported doing in 2025
Medical services: emergency medical services - we provide emergency medical services to the borough of carlisle, north middleton township and carlisle barracks and portions of south middleton, west pennsboro, dickinson, lower frankford and middlesex townships. 9,523 emergency responses in 2025.non emergency medical services - we also provide non-emergency medical transportation services to upmc carlisle and the citizens of our first due territory as requested. 3,297 non-emergency responses in 2025.chaplain service - our volunteer chaplains routinely ride along with our crews during several daylight and night shifts a week and are also available on call and by special request. The chaplain's role is basically one of support for our patients and their families during both emergency incidents and non-emergency transports, but their roles have extended to others involved with emergency incidents to include emergency responders and their families. While the chaplains approach is pastoral in nature, they approach individuals in a non-proselyting, non-denominational nature that offers comfort regardless of an individual's faith.training and education - cumberland goodwill offers training and education to the community at large. We have certified instructors who provide initial ems education for emergency medical responder, emt, and aemt courses and ongoing training and education for all levels of emergency service providers. We also provide first aid and cpr training to individuals, community groups, and schools throughout the region. Rehabilitation services - we provide rehab services for emergency workers at extended emergency incidents (e.g. Haz-mat, structure fires, structural collapse, extended search operations and mass casualty incidents) as a second alarm resource.in february 2024 cumberland goodwill ems' accreditation was renewed for a three year period by the commission on accreditation of ambulance servces (caas). We are one of only six pa agencies and one of nearly one hundred sixty agencies nationwide to meet this "gold standard" of modern emergency medical care. To achieve this rating cumberland goodwill met both the remote and onsite inspection standards of the commission for personnel, community and external relations, medical records, billing procedures, and communication processes. This independent voluntary process ensures that the residents of the greater carlisle area are receiving high-quality emergency care and that processes are in place for continuous improvement.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Earned-program. 88% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Fundraising costs are high for each dollar raised and expenses are high relative to revenue.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 86
- Transparency & Controls: 66
- Accountability: 88
- Sustainability: 16
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 95.3%; rating input score 95
- Program expense ratio: 91.6%; rating input score 92
- Fundraising efficiency: $7.39 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 25; 25th percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 92.9%; rating input score 93; 14th percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: 1 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 17
- Compensation committee: Missing
- Independent consultant: Missing
- Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
- Written employment contract: Missing
- Compensation survey or study: Missing
- Board or committee approval: Pass
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: No; rating input score 0
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 80%; rating input score 80; 16th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 8 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 100
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Other executive compensation review process: Pass
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -4.5%; rating input score 16; 16th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.36; rating input score 11; 11th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.38; rating input score 22; 22nd percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 16.3%; rating input score 20; 20th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 5.9% per year; rating input score 100; 41st percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 5.5% per year; rating input score 100; 41st percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 2.5% per year; rating input score 100; 20th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 95.3% of revenue deployed · 91.6% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 4 of 5 board members independent · 8 of 8 filing controls reported
- Programs: 2 filed program accomplishments · $6.2M in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $261K · 11 people listed · 1 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
- Highest-paid contractors: 1 contractor listed · $447K reported
- Consistency: 32 of 33 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
- Schedules: 6 filed schedules · includes major donors and executive pay
- Filing history: 16 filing years from 2010 to 2025
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 7 filed money-flow records
- Related organizations: 1 filed related-organization link
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 25/100.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 16/100.
- High — Transparency & Controls: Related-party transparency scored 0/100.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 11/100.
- Review — Transparency & Controls: Schedule R controlled transactions itemized did not reconcile in the filed values.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 20/100.
- High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 22/100.