Cumberland Crisis Pregnancy Center
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 581705496
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2012–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024
- Location
- Hendersonville, TN, USA
- Phone
- 6154511717
- Rating
- 88
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Reproductive Health Care Facilities and Allied Services
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $968,215
- Expenses
- $698,984
- Assets
- $3,948,531
- Liabilities
- $26,533
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
11 people listed
Highest reported compensation
- LAURA STEHL (Executive Dir.): $128,004 total reported compensation
- MELISSA MEYER (Executive Dir.): $118,253 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Valuing all human life, the ccpc provides hope to those experiencing an unplanned pregnancy, ministers healing to those who have experienced abortion and upholds truth to the community through sexual risk avoidance education.
What it reported doing in 2024
In 1990, the CCPC expanded its programs to include the Sexual Risk Avoidance Program. The Sexual Risk Avoidance (SRA) Program educates adolescents (primarily in public middle and high schools), about the physical, emotional, and psychological impacts of sexual activity outside of a permanently committed relationship, while encouraging sexual abstinence until marriage. Our certified sexual risk avoidance educators present this information in an age-appropriate format using well-documented and medically accurate information, while affirming each person's intrinsic worth. The goal of the sexual risk avoidance program is to teach students how to eliminate (not just reduce) the risks of teen pregnancy and sexually transmitted infections (STIs). In the 2024-25 school year, the SRA program made 165 presentations to 3,950 students.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 89% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
- Includes noncash contributions: Reported contributions include donated property or goods.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered and reported officer compensation is a large share of total spending, which may reflect staffing concentration.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 81
- Transparency & Controls: 92
- Accountability: 95
- Sustainability: 73
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 71.6%; rating input score 72
- Program expense ratio: 92.7%; rating input score 93
- Fundraising efficiency: $190.58 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 92; 92nd percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 7 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 88
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Other executive compensation review process: Fail
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 27.8%; rating input score 83; 83rd percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 5.65; rating input score 86; 86th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.01; rating input score 72; 72nd percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 35.2%; rating input score 5; 5th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 2.1% per year; rating input score 100; 27th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 3.8% per year; rating input score 100; 36th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 8.9% per year; rating input score 100; 55th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 71.6% of revenue deployed · 92.7% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 9 of 9 board members independent · 7 of 8 filing controls reported
- Programs: 3 filed program accomplishments · $648K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $128K · 11 people listed
- Consistency: 29 of 29 current checks pass
- Schedules: 5 filed schedules · includes major donors
- Filing history: 12 filing years from 2012 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 2 filed money-flow records
- Related organizations: Filed and resolved organization relationships.
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Review — Accountability: Governance controls: Other executive compensation review process not reported.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 5/100.