Ct Hezekiah Beardsley Chapter of America Academy of Pediatrics

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
222908719
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2022–2024
Forms available
Form 990 2013, Form 990-EZ 2024
Location
Hartford, CT, USA
Phone
8605259738
Rating confidence
Limited
Sector
Chambers of Commerce & Business Leagues

Reported finances

Revenue
$86,581
Expenses
$72,661
Assets
$51,078
Liabilities
$0

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

8 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • STEVEN ROGERS MD FAAP (PRESIDENT)
  • MIRIAM COHEN MD (VICE-PRESIDENT)
  • BARBARA ZIOGAS MD FAAP (IMMEDIATE PAST PRESIDENT)
  • RAY SAPUTELLI MBA CAE (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR)

People named in this filing

  • STEVEN ROGERS MD FAAP (PRESIDENT)
  • MIRIAM COHEN MD (VICE-PRESIDENT)
  • CLIFF O'CALLAHAN MD PHD FAAP (TREASURER)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

The Connecticut hezekiah beardsley chapter of the american academy of pediatrics has over 600 members committed to both improving the health and safety of Connecticut's children and supporting those who provide care to these children.

What it reported doing in 2024

The organization organizes and supports committees and conferences to distribute information to members, promoting children's health and welfare in the areas of obesity, school health, vaccine advisories, foster care, and other pediatric council initiatives. Teleconferencing has become the primary means of sharing information with members and other participants, which has increased participation.

Operating model

Revenue model
Membership-supported. 76% of the money available for current operations came from membership dues.
Distribution model
Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.

The verdict

- The available evidence is not sufficient to produce an overall rating for this filing. This is not a warning sign.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: NotEnoughData
  • Transparency & Controls: 100
  • Sustainability: 58
  • Growth: 20

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: Limited
  • Program expense ratio: Limited

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 16.1%; rating input score 69; 69th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.7; rating input score 37; 37th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 68; 68th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: Limited
  • Revenue growth: -2% per year; rating input score 0; 43rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 11.7% per year; rating input score 100; 76th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: Financial trends and filed revenue, expense, asset, and liability detail
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 8 people listed
  • Consistency: 7 of 7 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 3 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 3 filing years from 2022 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
  • Related organizations: 1 filed related-organization link
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

Grant-readiness screening is separate from the live rating, not a measure of program quality. Review the source records before making a grant decision.

  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 37/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.
  • High — Grant Readiness: Automatic revocation: this organization had its federal tax-exempt status automatically revoked.