Csu Bakersfield Auxiliary for Sponsored Programs Administration
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 320291662
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2011–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024
- Location
- Bakersfield, CA, USA
- Phone
- 6616542154
- Rating
- 66
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Single Organization Support
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $14,147,677
- Expenses
- $13,118,104
- Assets
- $5,950,972
- Liabilities
- $3,381,603
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
14 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- DR VERNON B HARPER JR (PRESIDENT)
- DR JAMES RODRIGUEZ (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR/SECRETARY)
Highest reported compensation
- DR VERNON B HARPER JR (PRESIDENT): $609,296 total reported compensation
- DR JAMES RODRIGUEZ (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR/SECRETARY): $425,452 total reported compensation
- THOM DAVIS (TREASURER / TERM 1.28.25): $393,131 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
The mission of the organization is to provide assistance to faculty and staff seeking external funding and other resources to support research and service projects for students, faculty, and the community.we also provide post-award assistance to faculty, staff, and the campus in administering awards both fiscally and programmatically.
What it reported doing in 2024
The department of education title iii program "an equitable pathway to in-demand stem careers" provides a suite of activities to provide equitable on-ramps to stem pathways and careers. Activities include stem outreach in service area community colleges and k-12 institutions, bilingual outreach for parents. For incoming and ongoing students, the grant aims to increase the sense of belonging through peer learning coaches, modifications to first year seminar, stemxtalk speaker series, networking events with local employers, increase internship and research opportunities, and strengthening industrial partnerships. In the fiscal year of 2024-25, 85 students were enrolled in the peer mentorship program. Among the 78 students in freshmen status that completed the required activities, the group achieved an average gpa of 3.29, and is 0.3 higher than the non-pathways group. Students also completed on average 4.917 units more. Both statistics can be shown to be statistically significant. The program organized 17 career talks featuring 16 career professionals in aerospace, biology, chemistry, computer science, engineering, science education, military, and public health, with a total of over 500 students in attendance. In the summer, a 5-week summer student research program was held at csub. A total of 64 students and nine faculty from csub, bc and taft college participated in the program. An additional 8 students participated in the year-round research program. Moreover, 23 students participated in the no-credit aws cloud foundation course. The grant program also completed the following construction and renovations projects: geological sciences laboratory, interdisciplinary undergraduate research laboratory, artificial intelligence research laboratory, and fablab space improvements.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Grant-funded. 96% of the money available for current operations came from government grants.
- Distribution model
- Hybrid. The nonprofit split its reported program spending across 76% for direct work, and 24% for grants.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. A relatively small share of voting board members are independent and few specific pay-setting methods are documented in the filing; unanswered boxes are not proof of absence.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 81
- Transparency & Controls: 60
- Accountability: 42
- Sustainability: 40
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 88.2%; rating input score 88
- Program expense ratio: 95.2%; rating input score 95
- Fundraising efficiency: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 62nd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: 0 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 0
- Compensation committee: Missing
- Independent consultant: Missing
- Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
- Written employment contract: Missing
- Compensation survey or study: Missing
- Board or committee approval: Missing
- Foreign activity oversight: Scored; rating input score 0
- Grant itemization coverage: 100%; rating input score 100; 72nd percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 8.3%; rating input score 8; 6th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 8 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 89
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Pass
- Other executive compensation review process: Pass
- Form 990 shared with the board: Fail
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 7.3%; rating input score 61; 61st percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.45; rating input score 14; 14th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.57; rating input score 24; 24th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 7.1%; rating input score 35; 35th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 6% per year; rating input score 100; 49th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 5.8% per year; rating input score 100; 50th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 10% per year; rating input score 100; 65th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 88.2% of revenue deployed · 95.2% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 1 of 12 board members independent · 8 of 9 filing controls reported
- Programs: 4 filed program accomplishments · $12.5M in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $609K · 14 people listed · 0 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
- Highest-paid contractors: 1 contractor listed · $255K reported
- Consistency: 30 of 30 current checks pass
- Schedules: 8 filed schedules · includes major donors, foreign activity, grants, and executive pay
- Filing history: 14 filing years from 2011 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
- Related organizations: 5 filed related-organization links
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Accountability: Independent voting board scored 8/100.
- High — Transparency & Controls: Pay-setting controls scored 0/100.
- High — Transparency & Controls: Foreign activity oversight scored 0/100.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 14/100.
- Review — Accountability: Governance controls: Form 990 shared with the board not reported.
- High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 24/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 35/100.