Csi-derby Street Non-profit Housing Corporation

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
942892231
IRS 990 coverage
2010–2021
Forms available
Form 990 2021
Location
Warren, MI, USA
Phone
5867539002
Rating confidence
Limited
Sector
Senior Citizens' Housing/Retirement Communities

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$0
Expenses
$670,695
Assets
$0
Liabilities
$0

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2021. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

19 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • ANNIE MITCHELL (PRESIDENT)
  • RILLAR MCDANIEL (VICE PRESIDENT)

Highest reported compensation

  • NANCY EVANS (ASSISTANT SECRETARY): $358,737 total reported compensation
  • MEL HUDSON (NATIONAL CONSTRUCTION MANAGER): $232,184 total reported compensation
  • ANNE SACKRISON (OPERATIONS MANAGER): $229,301 total reported compensation

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2021. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

To provide housing facilities for low income senior citizens.

What it reported doing in 2021

Csi-derby street non-profit housing corporation, is a California non-profit housing corporation organized on a non-stock basis by cooperative services, inc., a Michigan non-profit cooperative. The corporation was formed in september 1982 to acquire an interest in real property located in berkeley, California and to construct and operate thereon an apartment project of 169 units. Housing is provided to low income seniors in cooperation with the us department of housing and urban development.

Operating model

Revenue model
No positive adjusted resources. The filing reports no positive adjusted operating resources.
Distribution model
Grant intermediary. The nonprofit sent 97% of its reported program spending out as grants.

The verdict

- The available evidence is not sufficient to produce an overall rating for this filing. This is not a warning sign.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 75
  • Transparency & Controls: 68
  • Accountability: 84
  • Sustainability: 2
  • Growth: 80

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: Limited
  • Program expense ratio: 100%; rating input score 100
  • Fundraising efficiency: Limited

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: 0 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 0
    • Compensation committee: Missing
    • Independent consultant: Missing
    • Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
    • Written employment contract: Missing
    • Compensation survey or study: Missing
    • Board or committee approval: Missing
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: 100%; rating input score 100; 82nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 5 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 62
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Pass
    • Document-retention policy: Pass
    • CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Other executive compensation review process: Fail
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Missing
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Fail

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: Limited
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0; rating input score 3; 3rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
  • Officer compensation ratio: 45.2%; rating input score 7; 7th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 30.9% per year; rating input score 100; 89th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 25.7% per year; rating input score 100; 93rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: -4% per year; rating input score 0; 24th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 100% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 10 of 10 board members independent · 5 of 8 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $671K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $359K · 19 people listed · 0 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
  • Consistency: 15 of 15 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 6 filed schedules · includes grants and executive pay
  • Filing history: 12 filing years from 2010 to 2021
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
  • Related organizations: 82 filed related-organization links
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Transparency & Controls: Pay-setting controls scored 0/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 3/100.
  • Review — Accountability: Governance controls: 2 of 7 not reported.
  • High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 7/100.
  • High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.