Cs Community Housing West Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
992191153
IRS 990 coverage
2024–2025
Forms available
Form 990 2025
Location
Haverford, PA, USA
Phone
6467974374
Rating
82
Verdict
STRONG
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Low-Income & Subsidized Rental Housing

Reported finances

Revenue
$1,292,481
Expenses
$2,177,263
Assets
$15,697,155
Liabilities
$17,668,852

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

3 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • ROSANNE HAGGERTY (PRESIDENT AND DIRECTOR)

People named in this filing

  • ALLYSON RANDOLPH (SECRETARY/DIRECTOR (OUTGOING))
  • DAVE FOSTER (VP, TREAS, AND DIRECTOR)
  • ROSANNE HAGGERTY (PRESIDENT AND DIRECTOR)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

The purpose of the organization is to, directly or indirectly, work to solve homelessness in theunited states among veterans and others through the acquisition, holding, operation, transfer, sale, exchange, or other disposition of livingfacilities dedicated in part to veterans and others exiting homelessness and that otherwise qualify as affordable housing in a manner consistentwith the requirements of section 501(c)(3) of the code.

What it reported doing in 2025

The organization will acquire and own various multifamily communities with an anticipated holding period of 10 years for each community. The organization's first property, arcadia gardens, was acquired in march of 2024 and includes approximately 76 units. Currently 74 of 76 units are occupied. All residents will rent housing, and there will be none available for purchase. After acquisition of a facility, up to fifty percent of vacant units at each housing site will be leased to veterans and other individuals experiencing homelessness who have been identified, in partnership with the va and local housing system counterparts in the community, as individuals within the community's coordinated homelessness response system or on its by-name (homeless individuals) list. Unit availability will be provided on a weekly or bi-weekly basis to the local va and/or continuum of care partners. This process is followed until a given property reaches an up-to 50/50 mix of veterans and others who have recently exited homelessness and workforce affordable units.

Operating model

Revenue model
Earned-program. 92% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered and expenses are high relative to revenue.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 86
  • Transparency & Controls: 90
  • Accountability: 76
  • Sustainability: 36
  • Growth: 80

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 100%; rating input score 100
  • Program expense ratio: 89.8%; rating input score 90
  • Fundraising efficiency: Limited

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: Limited
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: Limited
  • Major donor itemization: Limited
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 3 of 7 controls in place; rating input score 43
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Fail
    • Document-retention policy: Fail
    • CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Missing
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Fail

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -68.5%; rating input score 1; 1st percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 7.21; rating input score 89; 89th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 1.13; rating input score 3; 3rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 78; 78th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 3.5% per year; rating input score 100; 29th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 30.3% per year; rating input score 100; 91st percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: -0.8% per year; rating input score 0; 13th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 100% of revenue deployed · 89.8% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 2 of 2 board members independent · 3 of 7 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $2M in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 3 people listed
  • Highest-paid contractors: 1 contractor listed · $158K reported
  • Consistency: 25 of 25 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 4 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 2 filing years from 2024 to 2025
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Related organizations: 7 filed related-organization links
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Moderate — Accountability: Governance controls: 3 of 6 not reported.
  • High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 1/100.
  • High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 3/100.