Crystal Oaks Long Term Care
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 205838963
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2023–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2022, Form 990-EZ 2024
- Location
- Crystal City, MO, USA
- Phone
- 6369331818
- Rating
- 59
- Verdict
- MIXED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Supportive Housing for Older Adults
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $4,313
- Expenses
- $407
- Assets
- $290,618
- Liabilities
- $0
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
8 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- CYNDI MORGAN (BOARD MEMBER/CEO)
People named in this filing
- WILLIAM DODSON (BOARD MEMBER)
- DAN ECKENFELS (BOARD CHAIR)
- RON PRESENT (BOARD MEMBER)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Assisted living and skilled nursing facility offering dementia care, long term care and rehabilitation.
What it reported doing in 2024
Assisted living is the ideal solution for seniors who value their independence, yet require assistance with daily activities (such as bath, dressing and dispensing their medications). For shorter term stays and recovery from surgery, stroke or other injury, we provide an ideal environment for healing and recovery at the oaks rehabilitation center. Crystal oaks operates "alden place" in the assisted living for alzheimer patients. The facility was sold on november 30th 2022, and the organization is wrapping up operations as a result.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Investment-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from recurring investment income.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
MIXED - The filed numbers largely add up and revenue comfortably covers expenses. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and program spending has declined or grown slowly.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 43
- Transparency & Controls: 82
- Sustainability: 91
- Growth: 0
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 9.4%; rating input score 9
- Program expense ratio: 100%; rating input score 100
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 90.6%; rating input score 99; 99th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 714.05; rating input score 100; 100th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 68; 68th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: -196.9% per year; rating input score 0; 1st percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: -5% per year; rating input score 0; 34th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: -7.7% per year; rating input score 0; 20th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 9.4% of revenue deployed · 100% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $407 in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 8 people listed
- Consistency: 8 of 8 current checks pass
- Schedules: 2 filed schedules
- Filing history: 2 filing years from 2023 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 4 filed money-flow records
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 9/100.
- High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
- High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
- High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.