Crusader Dads Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
832940439
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2019–2025
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2025
Location
Staten Island, NY, USA
Phone
9177764694
Rating
74
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Fund Raising and/or Fund Distribution
Affiliation
Christianity

Reported finances

Revenue
$19,680
Expenses
$19,464
Assets
$672

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

6 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • MICHAEL FICCHI (President)
  • ROBERT ROMANO (Vice President)
  • ROBERT VOLPE (Vice President)
  • THOMAS WEAVER (Vice President)

People named in this filing

  • CHRISTOPHER STUMPO (Secretary)
  • MICHAEL FICCHI (President)
  • ROBERT ROMANO (Vice President)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

The Corporation is organized and shall be operated for the purposes of: (i)establishing a group of fathers to build relationships and camaraderie with, and educate, one another as to the needs of St. Clare School, Staten Island, New York, all to promote and foster the wellness of St. Clare School and its parish and church community, and promote school spirit and improvement; and (ii) subject to the limitations set forth in the Corporations Certificate of Incorporation, engaging in any and all other lawful acts or activities, and exercising all such powers, rights and privileges applicable to not-for-profit corporations organized under the NPCL, in furtherance of accomplishing the foregoing corporate purposes.

What it reported doing in 2025

Establishing a group of fathers to build relationships and camaraderie with, and educate, one another as to the needs of St. Clare School, Staten Island, New York, all to promote and foster the wellness of St. Clare School and its parish and church community, and promote school spirit and improvement.

Operating model

Revenue model
Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent revenue detail to tell how this nonprofit funds its work.
Distribution model
Grant intermediary. The nonprofit sent 100% of its reported program spending out as grants.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Total assets are small relative to annual expenses; liquid coverage is unknown and expenses are high relative to revenue.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 72
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 31
  • Growth: 80

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 72.3%; rating input score 72
  • Program expense ratio: 73.1%; rating input score 73

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 1.1%; rating input score 47; 47th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.03; rating input score 9; 9th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 42.8% per year; rating input score 100; 91st percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 26.3% per year; rating input score 100; 92nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: -16.5% per year; rating input score 0; 12th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 72.3% of revenue deployed · 73.1% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $14K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 6 people listed
  • Consistency: 7 of 7 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 2 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 6 filing years from 2019 to 2025
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 9/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 47/100.
  • High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.