Crowned for Ashes Corp

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
833219077
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2019–2025
Forms available
Form 990 2022, Form 990-EZ 2025
Location
Navarre, FL, USA
Phone
2564669986
Rating
80
Verdict
STRONG
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Emergency Assistance

Reported finances

Revenue
$131,722
Expenses
$122,615
Assets
$329,733
Liabilities
$30,496

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

7 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • Ashley Olson (Executive Director)
  • Carly Woollard (President)
  • Lindsey McAllister (Steering Committee President)

People named in this filing

  • Ashley Olson (Executive Director)
  • Carly Woollard (President)
  • Lindsey Maines (Secretary)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

To provide support to wounded, ill & injured veterans and active-duty service members of the United States Armed Forces and their families, as well as widows through faith-inspired respite retreats & fellowship

What it reported doing in 2025

Fall Warrior Event: Bring Wounded warrior couples togetherfor a weekend of relaxation, time alone as a couple & in a group setting. Connect couples with similar life experience.

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

STRONG - The filed numbers largely add up and a large share of available resources goes toward mission work. Expenses are high relative to revenue and reported officer compensation is a large share of total spending, which may reflect staffing concentration.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 65
  • Transparency & Controls: 100
  • Sustainability: 52
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 63.2%; rating input score 63
  • Program expense ratio: 67.9%; rating input score 68

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 6.9%; rating input score 49; 49th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 2.69; rating input score 86; 86th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.09; rating input score 21; 21st percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 39.3%; rating input score 8; 8th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 31.3% per year; rating input score 100; 83rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 10% per year; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 21.4% per year; rating input score 100; 79th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 63.2% of revenue deployed · 67.9% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 2 filed program accomplishments · $83K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 7 people listed
  • Consistency: 7 of 7 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 4 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 6 filing years from 2019 to 2025
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 4 filed money-flow records
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 49/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 8/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 21/100.