Crossroads School Dba Crossroads College Preparatory School
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 237363267
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2010–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024
- Location
- St Louis, MO, USA
- Phone
- 3143678085
- Rating
- 75
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $3,812,035
- Expenses
- $3,527,040
- Assets
- $7,679,380
- Liabilities
- $3,476,885
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
17 people listed
Highest reported compensation
- MARK NORWOOD (CO-HEAD OF SCHOOL): $138,957 total reported compensation
- SARAH PIERSON-WOLFF (CO-HEAD OF SCHOOL): $134,774 total reported compensation
- MICHELLE CHLEBOWSKI (DIR. OF BUSINESS & OPERATI): $109,655 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Crossroads college preparatory school strives to be an exemplary and engaging learning community committed to justice and equity.
What it reported doing in 2024
Crossroads college preparatory school serves the saint louis region. Crossroads serves 121 students from over forty zip codes and a wide range of social, economic, racial, and other identities. Crossroads' mission sets the design standards of excellence and engagement for its rigorous college preparatory academic program as well as standards for participation and behavior. Its commitment to justice and equity further defines the standard for program content, teaching method, processes, procedures, and practices. Crossroads worked with leaders at the national association of independent schools to further define their work and created 5th day, an essential addition to what it means to be seen and supported, known and needed. 5th day is an educational laboratory for innovation focused on active engagement, community-based problem-solving, advocacy, and leadership.crossroads strives to create a diverse, inclusive, and supportive community, in part by offering financial aid to two-thirds of its students. The school supports students and their community through small classes, excellent academics, personalized college placement services, community-building activities, and a program engaging students and faculty in service to the broader community and seeking to raise awareness of social justice issues. In addition to its academic program, crossroads also offers a wide range of electives, activities, and student organizations, as well as a interscholastic sports program and work with local organizations.finally, 100% of graduates each year are accepted to college, many with acceptances to the finest colleges in the country. In 2025, crossroads graduated 24 seniors. The class of 2025 was accepted by 92 colleges and will attend 20 institutions in 13 states. The 24 students in the 2025 graduating class were offered more than $4.1 million in merit aid.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Mixed. Its operating money came from several sources; no one source provided a clear majority.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
- Includes noncash contributions: Reported contributions include donated property or goods.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and a large share of available resources goes toward mission work. Fundraising costs are high for each dollar raised and program spending has declined or grown slowly.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 64
- Transparency & Controls: 92
- Accountability: 96
- Sustainability: 52
- Growth: 0
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 63.4%; rating input score 63
- Program expense ratio: 68%; rating input score 68
- Fundraising efficiency: $16.76 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 54; 54th percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 92.9%; rating input score 93; 23rd percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 8 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 100
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Other executive compensation review process: Pass
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 7.5%; rating input score 57; 57th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 2.18; rating input score 65; 65th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.45; rating input score 23; 23rd percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 10.9%; rating input score 27; 27th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: -3.6% per year; rating input score 0; 6th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: -2.2% per year; rating input score 0; 6th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: -2.7% per year; rating input score 0; 6th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 63.4% of revenue deployed · 68% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 13 of 14 board members independent · 8 of 8 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $2.4M in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $139K · 17 people listed
- Consistency: 32 of 32 current checks pass
- Schedules: 8 filed schedules · includes major donors
- Filing history: 13 filing years from 2010 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 4 filed money-flow records
- Related organizations: Filed and resolved organization relationships.
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Review — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 54/100.
- High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
- High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 57/100.
- High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
- High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 23/100.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 27/100.