Crossroads at Mountain Meadows
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 570981557
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2013–2018
- Forms available
- Form 990 2018
- Location
- Greenville, SC, USA
- Phone
- 8642460266
- Rating
- 73
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Rape Victim Services
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $702,412
- Expenses
- $1,075,306
- Assets
- $459,133
- Liabilities
- $88,999
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2018. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
9 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- GREG HESTER (PRESIDENT)
- LORRAINE TURNER (CEO-EXOFFICI)
Highest reported compensation
- LORRAINE TURNER (CEO-EXOFFICI): $93,313 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2018. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Crossroads programs facilitate emotional healing and growth, physical health, basic education, restorative independent living skills, social and recreational functioning and vocational pursuit. For those served who are emotionally handicapped, the emphasis is on the the restorative and/or establishment of competence. Services are offered to promote integration of adolescents and families, when possible, into their communities in as normal a way as possible. We also strive to promote skill development, use of leisure time, community socialization and personal development. We strive to provide excellence and leadership in human services, to build its capacities and the capacities of others to enhance and promote nurturing and humane behavior toward all living things. The integration of children and animals is paramount. The facility offers year-round behavioral interventions to young women form all over the state of South Carolina. The program provides services within a health oriented,
What it reported doing in 2018
To provide behavioral intervention for abused females so they may be contributing and functioning members of the communinity. Forty-one girls were treated in the fiscal year.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Grant-funded. 98% of the money available for current operations came from government grants.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
- Includes noncash contributions: Reported contributions include donated property or goods.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. The required major-donor schedule is missing or incomplete and some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 86
- Transparency & Controls: 75
- Accountability: 77
- Sustainability: 17
- Growth: 0
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 100%; rating input score 100
- Program expense ratio: 90.7%; rating input score 91
- Fundraising efficiency: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 62nd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: No; rating input score 0
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 87.5%; rating input score 88; 19th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 5 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 62
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Pass
- Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Form 990 shared with the board: Fail
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Missing
- Independent financial-statement audit: Fail
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -53.1%; rating input score 2; 2nd percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.43; rating input score 23; 23rd percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.19; rating input score 37; 37th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 8.7%; rating input score 41; 41st percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: -1.2% per year; rating input score 0; 22nd percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: -6.6% per year; rating input score 0; 7th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: -1.9% per year; rating input score 0; 21st percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 100% of revenue deployed · 90.7% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 7 of 8 board members independent · 5 of 8 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $975K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $93K · 9 people listed
- Consistency: 25 of 25 current checks pass
- Schedules: 4 filed schedules · includes major donors
- Filing history: 5 filing years from 2013 to 2018
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 2 filed money-flow records
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Transparency & Controls: Major donor itemization scored 0/100.
- Review — Accountability: Governance controls: 2 of 7 not reported.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 2/100.
- High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
- High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 23/100.
- High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 37/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 41/100.