Crosspoint Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 746058916
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2009–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024
- Location
- San Antonio, TX, USA
- Phone
- 2105494695
- Rating
- 87
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $15,232,963
- Expenses
- $10,229,794
- Assets
- $16,244,660
- Liabilities
- $1,794,731
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
18 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- JOSEPH K DOWNEY (CEO)
Highest reported compensation
- JOSEPH SHAFFER (COO): $123,528 total reported compensation
- JOSEPH K DOWNEY (CEO): $33,750 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Crosspoint exists to build safer and stronger communities by empowering individuals to lead productive lives.
What it reported doing in 2024
Residential Corrections ProgramsResidential corrections programs include referrals from the Federal Bureau of Prisons, U.S. Probation, and U.S. Pretrial Services. Crosspoint provides a structured Residential Reentry Center (RRC) environment for individuals referred by these agencies. Accountability is the foundation for this service model. Residents are held accountable for their behavior and progress throughout the program, while staff are accountable for adhering to procedures that promote public safety by monitoring and managing resident activity in the community.Every resident undergoes assessment and individualized program planning. After a short in-house orientation period, the resident receives additional privileges that allow him or her to become further integrated into the community. Measures of program progress include obtaining employment, developing a realistic budget, improving family and community support systems, remaining drug- and alcohol-free, and developing a stable residential plan.The Crosspoint experience also includes group programs that address thinking errors, life skills needs, and employment skills. These programs help reduce recidivism and the attendant societal and economic costs by utilizing integrated, evidence-based tools and processes. Crosspoint strives to forge the essential alliance between criminal justice supervision, community service providers, and other community stakeholders to provide clients with the resources and guidance necessary to lead productive lives and achieve restoration of citizenship.Community Residential ProgramsCommunity residential programs include a program for homeless veterans under contract with the Department of Veterans Affairs Healthcare for Homeless Veterans (HCHV) program. This housing-first model offers residents a stable living environment from which to address physical and behavioral health needs through the DVA and to build the economic resources to transition into a stable living situation in the community.Community residential programs also include a recovery support home for women beginning recovery, diversion programs for victims of human trafficking facing prostitution charges, and for low-level offenders with mental health and/or addiction problems. Each of these populations benefits from a stable, safe, and professionally staffed setting that facilitates access to community resources with support that helps ensure compliance with court requirements.Outpatient ProgramsThe outpatient programs also offer services under a grant from the State of Texas for veterans, their families, and caregivers. These individual, group, and family services are available to both honorably discharged veterans as well as those with less than honorable discharges.Casa MiaCasa Mia houses pregnant or parenting women and their children at Pryor House. These women have been diagnosed with opioid use disorder and have given birth to infants with narcotic abstinence syndrome, or they are pregnant or caring for young children while in treatment.Casa Mias open-ended transitional housing for women and children takes place in a 20-bed home-like setting with wrap-around services. Casa Mia is a unique model program that fills a critical service gap. This setting allows women the opportunity to complete treatment without having to surrender custody of their children, and gives them time to establish more stable recoveryincluding economic independence and an enhanced support system. These elements are critical if relapse is to be avoided in early recovery.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Earned-program. 66% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
- Includes noncash contributions: Reported contributions include donated property or goods.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered and total assets are small relative to annual expenses; liquid coverage is unknown.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 80
- Transparency & Controls: 92
- Accountability: 91
- Sustainability: 75
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 66%; rating input score 66
- Program expense ratio: 98.6%; rating input score 99
- Fundraising efficiency: $441.08 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 94; 94th percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 62nd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 66th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 7 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 78
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Pass
- Other executive compensation review process: Pass
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Missing
- Independent financial-statement audit: Fail
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 32.8%; rating input score 89; 89th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.59; rating input score 53; 53rd percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.11; rating input score 72; 72nd percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 1.5%; rating input score 81; 81st percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 8.5% per year; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 6.9% per year; rating input score 100; 58th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 7.1% per year; rating input score 100; 49th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 66% of revenue deployed · 98.6% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 16 of 16 board members independent · 7 of 9 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $10.1M in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $124K · 18 people listed
- Highest-paid contractors: 5 contractors listed
- Consistency: 31 of 31 current checks pass
- Schedules: 5 filed schedules · includes major donors
- Filing history: 16 filing years from 2009 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 2 filed money-flow records
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
- Staff and benefit plans: Retirement and health plans the organization files with the Department of Labor, and the people in them.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Review — Accountability: Governance controls: Independent financial-statement audit not reported.
- Review — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 53/100.