Crossover Ministry Association
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 475121443
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2019–2025
- Forms available
- Form 990 2025
- Location
- Norman, OK, USA
- Phone
- 4695853844
- Rating
- 52
- Verdict
- MIXED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Christianity
- Affiliation
- Christianity
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $589,461
- Expenses
- $480,951
- Assets
- $535,214
- Liabilities
- $0
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
6 people listed
Highest reported compensation
- BRENT RUSSELL (DIRECTOR): $72,505 total reported compensation
- CAROLINE RUSSELL (KEY EMPLOYEE): $33,000 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
That revival is coming, and they feel 47-5121443 humbled and blessed to be apart ofwhat the lord is doing at the university of Oklahoma and campuses beyond! Crossover information - we are a ministry that meets tuesday nights at9:00pm on the campus of the university of Oklahoma. We believe that we areall broken people, who are in need of a savior, and his name is jesuschrist. He came so that we can have life and have it mor eabundantly.without him we can do nothing, but with him we can doanything. Our goal forthis ministry is to work with local gospel-centered churches to spread thegood news of jesus christ. We covet your prayers. Pray for crossover, prayfor this campus, pray forour young people. Love god and love others. Thelargest expense of the organization is a large (approx 1000 studentsattend) weekly worship service. The production costs involved are large aswell.
What it reported doing in 2025
Minister/director information - all expenses are connected to brent and largest expenses of the organization are the on going operation and production costs of the weekly worhsip service ( $146212.56) total payroll expenses are the second largest expense (150, 082.23) and include fulltime, parttime and muscian payments. Fulltime, parttime and muscian payments.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
MIXED - The filed numbers largely add up and program spending has grown recently. Some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered and a relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 44
- Transparency & Controls: 90
- Accountability: 0
- Sustainability: 58
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 46.1%; rating input score 46
- Program expense ratio: 56.5%; rating input score 56
- Fundraising efficiency: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Limited
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: Limited
- Governance controls: 0 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 0
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Fail
- Whistleblower policy: Fail
- Document-retention policy: Fail
- CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Other executive compensation review process: Missing
- Form 990 shared with the board: Fail
- Board meeting minutes documented: Fail
- Audit committee oversight: Missing
- Independent financial-statement audit: Fail
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 18.4%; rating input score 70; 70th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.11; rating input score 46; 46th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 88; 88th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 21.9%; rating input score 14; 14th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 22.1% per year; rating input score 100; 82nd percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 19.3% per year; rating input score 100; 82nd percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 27.4% per year; rating input score 100; 87th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 46.1% of revenue deployed · 56.5% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 0 of 8 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $272K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $73K · 6 people listed
- Consistency: 16 of 16 current checks pass
- Schedules: 3 filed schedules
- Filing history: 6 filing years from 2019 to 2025
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 2 filed money-flow records
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Accountability: Governance controls: 6 of 6 not reported.
- Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 46/100.
- Review — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 56/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 46/100.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 14/100.