Cross Cultural Ministries Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
582053705
IRS 990 coverage
2015–2024
Forms available
Form 990 2024, Form 990-N 2014
Location
Doraville, GA, USA
Phone
4704375812
Rating
75
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Protestant
Affiliation
Christianity

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$268,014
Expenses
$281,595
Assets
$53,691
Liabilities
$47,727

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

10 people listed

Highest reported compensation

  • ADRIANE WAGNER (Executive Dir.): $60,450 total reported compensation

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

The organization's mission is to put Gods love into action through educational and discipleship programs to disadvantaged children, youth and adults in community-based centers in partnership with individuals, churches and organizations.

What it reported doing in 2024

For the year ended July 31, 2025, Cross-Cultural Ministries, Inc. operated the following programs: Cross Cultural Ministries provides after school academic support and Christ centered discipleship for children and youth in the Chamblee community. Each week, CCM serves over 100 students through consistent programming at our Chamblee site, made possible by a dedicated team of approximately 50 volunteers alongside staff leadership.After School Academic Support and TutoringDuring the school year, CCM provided after school homework assistance and tutoring multiple days each week at our Chamblee site. Students received help completing assignments along with tutoring support in reading, English, and math. In addition to group support, select students received one on one tutoring to strengthen literacy and language skills.Bible Clubs and DiscipleshipCCM provided weekly Bible clubs for children at our Chamblee site, including a Kindergarten Bible club and Bible clubs for elementary students. These clubs create a consistent space for children to learn Scripture, hear the Gospel, and grow in Christian character. Discipleship for older students also included Bible study and mentoring for high school students, led by volunteer leaders and supported by staff.High School Youth DevelopmentCCM supported high school students through Bible study, mentoring, and opportunities to grow in leadership and service. Programming emphasized spiritual formation, character development, and practical life skills, while helping students grow in confidence and responsibility.Summer Learning and EnrichmentDuring the summer, CCM provided structured learning opportunities to support continued reading growth. Programs included reading focused sessions for elementary students and early literacy support for younger readers. CCM also partnered with local churches for summer enrichment experiences such as Vacation Bible School, with staff and volunteers helping students participate.Mentoring, Leadership Development, and Student Scholarship FundCCM intentionally invests in selected high school students by training and supporting them to serve as mentors and leaders with younger children in our programs. These student leaders assist with age appropriate activities, encouragement, and support in the learning environment, gaining valuable leadership experience and a heart for service.Through CCMs Student Scholarship Fund, the ministry also provides scholarship support to help students pursue future education. This year, two students are currently attending university with the help of CCM funding, and three additional high school students are active participants in the Student Scholarship Fund support pipeline as they prepare for their next steps after graduation.

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
  • Includes noncash contributions: Reported contributions include donated property or goods.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and a large share of available resources goes toward mission work. Some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered and fundraising costs are high for each dollar raised.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 68
  • Transparency & Controls: 92
  • Accountability: 69
  • Sustainability: 20
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 73.6%; rating input score 74
  • Program expense ratio: 70%; rating input score 70
  • Fundraising efficiency: $8.49 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 35; 35th percentile among comparable filings

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: Limited
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: Limited
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 2 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 25
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Fail
    • Document-retention policy: Fail
    • CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Other executive compensation review process: Fail
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Fail
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Fail
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Fail

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -5.1%; rating input score 29; 29th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.19; rating input score 11; 11th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.89; rating input score 6; 6th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 21.5%; rating input score 18; 18th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 9.6% per year; rating input score 100; 69th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 10.8% per year; rating input score 100; 74th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 6.3% per year; rating input score 100; 53rd percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 73.6% of revenue deployed · 70% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 9 of 9 board members independent · 2 of 8 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $197K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $60K · 10 people listed
  • Consistency: 23 of 23 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 4 filed schedules · includes major donors
  • Filing history: 9 filing years from 2015 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Accountability: Governance controls: 6 of 8 not reported.
  • Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 35/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 29/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 11/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 6/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 18/100.