Critical Infrastructure Security Consortium

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
992580706
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2024–2024
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2024
Location
Owings Mills, MD, USA
Phone
6302513964
Rating
84
Verdict
STRONG
Rating confidence
Moderate

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$15,000
Expenses
$15,000
Assets
$0
Liabilities
$0

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

4 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • Kevin Jones (President)
  • Jennifer Flandermeyer (Vice President)

People named in this filing

  • Kevin Jones (President)
  • Jennifer Flandermeyer (Vice President)
  • Jeremy Tucker (Treasurer)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

The CISC is a continually growing and evolving organization of electric, gas, oil, transportation, and water asset owners and business organizations who work together to ensure supply chain activities and supplier networks are protected from cyber and other business impactful risks. Our mission, through the strength of our growing alliance and extended network, is to provide the information and tools necessary to enhance and strengthen cyber security and reduce operational risk in the global business environment. We are a coordinating council that connects people, institutions and companies that have shown a commitment to our mission, and we position them for even greater success. Specifically, we maintain a network of the country's leading talent, tools, information, and corporate partners which can be utilized for smarter procurement decisions and event response.

What it reported doing in 2024

Designed and implemented a workforce development program at Stonybrook University, focusing on teaching students about cybersecurity within the utility and energy business.

Operating model

Revenue model
Earned-program. 100% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Total assets are small relative to annual expenses; liquid coverage is unknown and expenses are high relative to revenue.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 100
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 28
  • Growth: NotEnoughData

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 100%; rating input score 100
  • Program expense ratio: 100%; rating input score 100

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 0%; rating input score 45; 45th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0; rating input score 2; 2nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: Limited
  • Revenue growth: Limited
  • Asset growth: Limited

Details

  • Where the money goes: 100% of revenue deployed · 100% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $15K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 4 people listed
  • Consistency: 9 of 9 current checks pass
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 2/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 45/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.