Crisis Pregnancy Center of Prince William County
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 541522705
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2010–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024
- Location
- Manassas, VA, USA
- Phone
- 7033304572
- Rating
- 82
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Reproductive Health Care Facilities and Allied Services
- Affiliation
- Christianity
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $1,423,731
- Expenses
- $1,129,443
- Assets
- $1,935,980
- Liabilities
- $22,421
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
6 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- NANCY ROGERS (PRESIDENT)
People named in this filing
- ANTHONY CRISP (BOARD MEMBER)
- DAVID DISE (TREASURER)
- ERIKA LEBARON (BOARD MEMBER)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
We are a christ centered ministry which upholds the sacred value of life in three major areas. Those three areas are help with unplanned pregnancies, teach abstinence and offer spiritual healing from the effects of abortion.
What it reported doing in 2024
The organization provides an ultrasound program, a client support program a ready-on-arrival program, a men's program, a sexual integrity program, and an abortion recovery program. The ultrasound program provides pregnancy confirmation, exams, and limited ultrasounds with a focus on women who are abortion minded, abortion vulnerable or undecided about their unplanned pregnancy. No discrimination is made according to ethnicity, religion, age or marital status. The client support program seeks to give the best for those affected by an untimely pregnancy. Understanding the situation and knowing the mother has to make her own choices, we give the client accurate and complete information about both prenatal development and abortion, assisting women to carry to term by providing emotional support and practical assistance. We provide free services such as pregnancy tests, limited ultraound services, peer counseling, and education. The ready-on-arrival program provides the expectant mother education about her pregnancy and the hope to know she can make a difference in her and her baby's life. This program also provides material assistance such as clothes, baby formula, diapers and shelter if needed.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 97% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
- Includes noncash contributions: Reported contributions include donated property or goods.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered and fundraising costs are high for each dollar raised.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 70
- Transparency & Controls: 92
- Accountability: 88
- Sustainability: 71
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 65.6%; rating input score 66
- Program expense ratio: 79.8%; rating input score 80
- Fundraising efficiency: $20.15 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 59; 59th percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 5 of 7 controls in place; rating input score 71
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Form 990 shared with the board: Fail
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Fail
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 20.7%; rating input score 77; 77th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.71; rating input score 60; 60th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.01; rating input score 67; 67th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 81; 81st percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 5.5% per year; rating input score 100; 45th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 8.6% per year; rating input score 100; 61st percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 10.5% per year; rating input score 100; 60th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 65.6% of revenue deployed · 79.8% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 6 of 6 board members independent · 5 of 7 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $901K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 6 people listed
- Consistency: 29 of 29 current checks pass
- Schedules: 6 filed schedules · includes major donors
- Filing history: 15 filing years from 2010 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: Resolved incoming and outgoing counterparties from filed money flows.
- Related organizations: Filed and resolved organization relationships.
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Review — Accountability: Governance controls: 2 of 7 not reported.
- Review — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 59/100.