Crisis Pregnancy Center of New Braunfels
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 742393875
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2011–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024
- Location
- New Braunfels, TX, USA
- Phone
- 8306297565
- Rating
- 77
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Affiliation
- Christianity
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $851,549
- Expenses
- $692,627
- Assets
- $3,087,498
- Liabilities
- $259
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
13 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- Suzie Dionne (President)
- Tom Taylor (Vice President)
- Beverly Ewald BSW (Executive Director)
Highest reported compensation
- Beverly Ewald BSW (Executive Director): $90,302 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Options is a Christ centered organization dedicated to educating and encouraging people to choose life, to make positive sexual choices, and bring healiing to thse affected by abortion.
What it reported doing in 2024
During FY 2024, the organization saw 1,030 unique clients for the purpose of education and guidance regarding unplanned pregnancies and sexually transmitted infections. In addition, 751 ultrasounds were performed on clients testing positive for pregnancy. The organization also operates a resource center which provides diapers, baby wipes, and other baby supplies. During this period, the Resource Center had 2,116 visits . The organization tested positive for sexually transmitted infections (STIs). Education about STIs was provided to 42 clients and 10 clients were treated for STIs. The Organization teaches parenting classes approved by the Texas Department of Familt and Protective Services. 121 hours of parenting classes were provided to court mandated parents, while 10,637 hours of parenting classes were completed by others. <Need additional statement>
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 84% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 99% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
- Includes noncash contributions: Reported contributions include donated property or goods.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered and fundraising costs are high for each dollar raised.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 70
- Transparency & Controls: 86
- Accountability: 74
- Sustainability: 73
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 67.2%; rating input score 67
- Program expense ratio: 78.6%; rating input score 79
- Fundraising efficiency: $18.68 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 57; 57th percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 92.9%; rating input score 93; 19th percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 3 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 38
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Fail
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Fail
- Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Form 990 shared with the board: Fail
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Missing
- Independent financial-statement audit: Fail
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 18.7%; rating input score 75; 75th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 4.46; rating input score 83; 83rd percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 82; 82nd percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 13%; rating input score 28; 28th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 6.2% per year; rating input score 100; 48th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 4.8% per year; rating input score 100; 42nd percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 7.5% per year; rating input score 100; 49th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 67.2% of revenue deployed · 78.6% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 11 of 11 board members independent · 3 of 8 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $545K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $90K · 13 people listed
- Consistency: 26 of 27 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
- Schedules: 5 filed schedules · includes major donors
- Filing history: 13 filing years from 2011 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Moderate — Accountability: Governance controls: 4 of 7 not reported.
- Review — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 57/100.
- Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Schedule A contributions reconciliation did not reconcile in the filed values.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 28/100.