Crisis Intervention Shelter Service
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 363792902
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2010–2025
- Forms available
- Form 990 2025
- Location
- Sturgis, SD, USA
- Rating
- 81
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $160,997
- Expenses
- $154,608
- Assets
- $256,016
- Liabilities
- $176,337
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
11 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- PAM THOMAS (Vice President)
- DAWN MCCARTHY (President)
- JENNIFER NESS (President)
Highest reported compensation
- ASHLEY ADAMS (Executive Dir.): $49,583 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Assistance to victims of violence.provide women & children salfe shelter, support groups, advocacy, referrals, financial assistance, hotline.
What it reported doing in 2025
Assistance to victims of violence. Provide women & children safe shelter, support groups, advocacy, referrals, financial assistance, hotline
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Mixed. Its operating money came from several sources; no one source provided a clear majority.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 93% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered and expenses are high relative to revenue.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 83
- Transparency & Controls: 94
- Accountability: 64
- Sustainability: 39
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 84.1%; rating input score 84
- Program expense ratio: 87.6%; rating input score 88
- Fundraising efficiency: $33.45 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 66; 66th percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: 100%; rating input score 100; 81st percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 90.9%; rating input score 91; 27th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 2 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 25
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Fail
- Whistleblower policy: Fail
- Document-retention policy: Fail
- CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Other executive compensation review process: Fail
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Missing
- Independent financial-statement audit: Fail
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 4%; rating input score 45; 45th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.66; rating input score 54; 54th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.69; rating input score 6; 6th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 32.1%; rating input score 10; 10th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 4.1% per year; rating input score 100; 47th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 2.1% per year; rating input score 100; 31st percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 0.6% per year; rating input score 100; 25th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 84.1% of revenue deployed · 87.6% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 10 of 11 board members independent · 2 of 8 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $135K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $50K · 11 people listed
- Consistency: 27 of 27 current checks pass
- Schedules: 5 filed schedules · includes major donors and grants
- Filing history: 15 filing years from 2010 to 2025
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
- Related organizations: Filed and resolved organization relationships.
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Accountability: Governance controls: 5 of 7 not reported.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 45/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 54/100.
- High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 6/100.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 10/100.