Crisis Center of Dodge City Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 480975166
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2012–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024
- Location
- Dodge City, KS, USA
- Phone
- 6202256987
- Rating
- 85
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Family Violence Shelters
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $377,112
- Expenses
- $367,404
- Assets
- $249,370
- Liabilities
- $20,833
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
12 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- Kirk Larson (President)
- Dale Coleman (Vice-President)
- Tammie West (Executive Director)
Highest reported compensation
- Tammie West (Executive Director): $48,502 total reported compensation
- Lynne Kreft (Bookkeeper): $16,480 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
The Crisis Center of Dodge City mission is to empower people affected by Domestic Violence or Sexual Assault while striving to prevent and end the cycle of abuse through education, self discovery of needs and personal choices and helping persons learn to build boundaries for healthy relationships.
What it reported doing in 2024
The Crisis Center served 176 new victims and 46 continuing clients of the new victims served they provided shelter to 21 families with 6 children. The Crisis Center provided 1222 advocacy services, responded to 149 hotline calls, and assisted with 33 protection orders. The Crisis Center provided 191 outreach support groups to 1712 participants to men in substance abuse program at New Chance, to women in the Ford. Co. Jail twice a week, DCHS students in Communities in Schools and DCHS and DCMS Exito after school groups to students and Park Plaza residents. The Loads of Love project in Meade County partnered with a local business to help families with the cost of 3 loads of laundry and sharing information about CCDC services.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Earned-program. 87% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 93% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered and expenses are high relative to revenue.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 88
- Transparency & Controls: 88
- Accountability: 82
- Sustainability: 36
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 86.4%; rating input score 86
- Program expense ratio: 88.7%; rating input score 89
- Fundraising efficiency: $334.76 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 94; 94th percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 92.9%; rating input score 93; 25th percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: 93.6%; rating input score 94; 54th percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 5 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 56
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Fail
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Fail
- Other executive compensation review process: Fail
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Fail
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 2.6%; rating input score 45; 45th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.68; rating input score 31; 31st percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.08; rating input score 28; 28th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 17.7%; rating input score 21; 21st percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 1.8% per year; rating input score 100; 38th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 2.7% per year; rating input score 100; 39th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 2.5% per year; rating input score 100; 36th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 86.4% of revenue deployed · 88.7% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 10 of 10 board members independent · 5 of 9 filing controls reported
- Programs: 2 filed program accomplishments · $326K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $49K · 12 people listed
- Consistency: 28 of 29 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
- Schedules: 5 filed schedules · includes major donors and grants
- Filing history: 12 filing years from 2012 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 2 filed money-flow records
- Related organizations: Filed and resolved organization relationships.
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Review — Accountability: Governance controls: 4 of 9 not reported.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 45/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 31/100.
- Review — Transparency & Controls: Domestic grant itemization did not reconcile in the filed values.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 21/100.
- High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 28/100.