Crewe Endowment Foundation
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 843378692
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2022–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024, Form 990-N 2019
- Location
- Salt Lake City, UT, USA
- Phone
- 8016187549
- Rating
- 66
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Fund Raising and Fund Distribution
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $55,509,895
- Expenses
- $16,281,946
- Assets
- $50,186,188
- Liabilities
- $85,000
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
3 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- K DONALD EVANS (President)
People named in this filing
- K DONALD EVANS (President)
- M BRETT GIBBONS (BOARD MEMBER)
- SIMON H CROSS (BOARD MEMBER)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Operates exclusively for the benefit of, to perform the functions of, and/or carry out the purposes of crewe foundation, a Utah nonprofit organization, which is exempt under section 501(c)(3) of the internal revenue code.
What it reported doing in 2024
Empowers charitable organizations and charitable efforts by enabling donors to become more efficient and impactful in their philanthropic giving.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 96% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Grant intermediary. The nonprofit sent 98% of its reported program spending out as grants.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and program spending has grown recently. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 52
- Transparency & Controls: 89
- Accountability: 45
- Sustainability: 91
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 33.1%; rating input score 33
- Program expense ratio: 100%; rating input score 100
- Fundraising efficiency: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 91.7%; rating input score 92; 8th percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: 99%; rating input score 99; 37th percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 66.7%; rating input score 67; 19th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 1 of 7 controls in place; rating input score 14
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Fail
- Document-retention policy: Fail
- CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Form 990 shared with the board: Fail
- Board meeting minutes documented: Fail
- Audit committee oversight: Missing
- Independent financial-statement audit: Fail
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 70.7%; rating input score 98; 98th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 3.08; rating input score 76; 76th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 97; 97th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 98; 98th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 89.5% per year; rating input score 100; 99th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 88.8% per year; rating input score 100; 99th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 73.3% per year; rating input score 100; 99th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 33.1% of revenue deployed · 100% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 2 of 3 board members independent · 1 of 7 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $16.3M in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 3 people listed
- Consistency: 14 of 15 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
- Schedules: 5 filed schedules · includes major donors and grants
- Filing history: 3 filing years from 2022 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 49 filed money-flow records
- Related organizations: 49 filed related-organization links
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 33/100.
- High — Accountability: Governance controls: 5 of 6 not reported.
- Review — Transparency & Controls: Domestic grant itemization did not reconcile in the filed values.