Crew Ct-the Real Estate Exchange Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 061219446
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2010–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2024
- Location
- Hartford, CT, USA
- Phone
- 8605223111
- Rating
- 65
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $120,981
- Expenses
- $132,463
- Assets
- $150,921
- Liabilities
- $19,852
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
6 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- ERIN CABELUS (PRESIDENT)
- JUDY SCHULER (PRESIDENT-ELECT, DELEGATE)
- DINORA LOPEZ (PAST PRESIDENT)
People named in this filing
- ERIN CABELUS (PRESIDENT)
- JUDY SCHULER (PRESIDENT-ELECT, DELEGATE)
- DINORA LOPEZ (PAST PRESIDENT)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
The crew ct - the real estate exchange, inc.'s mission is to provide a networking and social forum for commercial real estate professionals of every related field and discipline. It is the only commercial real estate organization in Connecticut where a cross section of professionals, including finance, design, construction, sales, appraisal, law, property management, and development, can network directly with other industry professionals.
What it reported doing in 2024
To educate and provide a network forum for commercial real estate professionals in Connecticut.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Mixed. Its operating money came from several sources; no one source provided a clear majority.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and program spending has grown recently. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 51
- Transparency & Controls: 82
- Sustainability: 36
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 53.3%; rating input score 53
- Program expense ratio: 47%; rating input score 47
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -9.5%; rating input score 16; 16th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.14; rating input score 64; 64th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.13; rating input score 22; 22nd percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 63; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 29% per year; rating input score 100; 83rd percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 2.3% per year; rating input score 100; 33rd percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 12.6% per year; rating input score 100; 68th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 53.3% of revenue deployed · 47% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $62K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 6 people listed
- Consistency: 8 of 8 current checks pass
- Schedules: 2 filed schedules
- Filing history: 14 filing years from 2010 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Review — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 53/100.
- Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 47/100.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 16/100.
- High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 22/100.