Crew Club At The Ohio State

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
311421193
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2022–2025
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2025
Location
Columbus, OH, USA
Phone
3309045460
Rating
39
Verdict
REVIEW
Rating confidence
Moderate

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$83,497
Expenses
$69,375
Assets
$28,548
Liabilities
$0

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

8 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • Andrew Schweiger (President)
  • Draeden Rowe (Vice President of Budgeting)

People named in this filing

  • Andrew Schweiger (President)
  • James Malebranch (Director of Rowing)
  • Draeden Rowe (Vice President of Budgeting)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Rowing at the Collegiate Level, giving men and women an oppurtunity to learn about rowing and row, expanding the sport of rowing, and creating a community of individuals with similar goals.

What it reported doing in 2025

This year we were able to grow our team to 37 individuals. This marked the first year we wre able to put our multiple mens eight man lineups since 2022. We spent our year closing in on the competition that in previous years had been untouchable. As a team we are improving tremendously compaored to everyone else in the American Collegiate Rowing Association. Not only is our skill improving, but the culture on the team is becoming more competitive and motivational. Everyone on the team is pushed to succeed in the sport and in classes and personal lives as well. Overall we are improving our organization year after year and crating a better oppurtunity for collegiate men and women to learn the sprt of rowing and develop amazing characters, while learning life lessons at the same time.

Operating model

Revenue model
Membership-supported. 65% of the money available for current operations came from membership dues.
Distribution model
No current program activity. The filing reports no program spending for the current year.

The verdict

REVIEW - The filed numbers largely add up and revenue has grown recently. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 0
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 55
  • Growth: 60

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 0%; rating input score 0
  • Program expense ratio: 0%; rating input score 0

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 16.9%; rating input score 69; 69th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.41; rating input score 28; 28th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 66; 66th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: -118.2% per year; rating input score 0; 3rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 5.7% per year; rating input score 100; 71st percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 16.5% per year; rating input score 100; 81st percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 0% of revenue deployed · 0% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 8 people listed
  • Consistency: 9 of 9 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 1 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 4 filing years from 2022 to 2025
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 0/100.
  • High — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 28/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.